WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HF 3866

Oak Park Heights appropriation modified.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Ned Carroll and 4 co-sponsors

HF 3866 modifies an existing state appropriation for Oak Park Heights within the Capital Investment framework, altering funding terms or scope for a listed project.

Introduction and first reading, referred to Capital Investment
#appropriations #citiesandtowns-specific
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 3866

Bill Summary — HF 3866 (Minnesota 2025-2026)

Title

Oak Park Heights appropriation modified

Purpose and intent

HF 3866 seeks to modify an appropriation related to Oak Park Heights, Minnesota. The bill is positioned within the capital investment framework, aiming to adjust funding for a project or set of projects within the city. The exact project scope and funding level are not specified in the provided information, but the title indicates a modification to an existing appropriation for Oak Park Heights.

Key provisions and changes

  • Modification of an existing appropriation: The primary action is altering a previously authorized state appropriation tied to Oak Park Heights. This could involve changing the total amount, the timing, the terms of disbursement, or the project scope.
  • Capital Investment context: Referred to the Capital Investment committee, indicating that the modification concerns capital projects such as public infrastructure, facilities, or community development initiatives funded by state dollars.
  • Legislative status: Introduced and read for the first time on 2026-03-02, official action listed as referred to the Capital Investment committee. No further committee actions or floor actions are provided in the current record.

Who/what would be affected

  • Oak Park Heights: The city (and its residents) stands to be affected, particularly if the modification changes project scope, timelines, or funding levels.
  • State funding mechanisms: Potential impacts on how state capital funds are allocated, disbursed, or reprogrammed for Oak Park Heights.
  • Project stakeholders: Local government, contractors, and community partners involved in the specific project(s) funded by the appropriation.

Procedural and timeline considerations

  • Introduction and referral: The bill has been introduced and sent to the Capital Investment committee for consideration.
  • Next steps: In typical Minnesota legislative procedure, the committee would review the proposed modification, hold hearings, and potentially amend the bill before advancing to floor action. If passed, it would go to the other chamber and, eventually, to the governor for signature or veto.
  • Timeline uncertainty: Without additional amendments or committee output, the precise financial figures, project details, and effective dates remain unspecified.

Notes

  • The bill lists several co-sponsors (Mary Clardy, Josiah Hill, Ned Carroll, Rick Hansen, Ethan Cha), indicating bipartisan or cross-chamber support considerations, though sponsor details alone do not determine outcome.
  • Specific dollar amounts, project descriptions, funding categories (e.g., grant vs. loan, construction vs. renovation), and timetable are not provided in the brief action history available.

If you can share the bill’s fiscal note, the exact appropriation modification language, or the committee memo, I can provide a more precise, line-by-line breakdown of the modified appropriation and its anticipated impacts.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.