WeVote

Bill

Bill

HF 3198

Northwest Metro Regional Real Time Crime Center funding provided, report required, and money appropriated.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Robert Bierman and 9 co-sponsors

The bill would fund and establish a Northwest Metro Regional Real Time Crime Center for real-time interagency intelligence sharing and operations, with required reporting.

Author added Freiberg
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 3198

Bill Summary: HF 3198 (2025-2026) — Northwest Metro Regional Real Time Crime Center funding, reporting, and appropriation

Bill at a glance

  • Jurisdiction: Minnesota
  • Session: 2025-2026
  • Title: Northwest Metro Regional Real Time Crime Center funding provided, report required, and money appropriated
  • Introduced: 2025-04-21 (first reading; referred to Public Safety Finance and Policy)
  • Current status: Introduced; author additions and multiple co-sponsors listed
  • Primary policy objective: Fund and establish a Northwest Metro Regional Real Time Crime Center (RTC) with associated reporting requirements and appropriations, enabling enhanced real-time coordination of law enforcement across participating jurisdictions in the Northwest Twin Cities metro region.

Purpose and intent

  • The bill intends to create or support a Northwest Metro Regional Real Time Crime Center to enable real-time intelligence sharing, coordination, and situational awareness among law enforcement agencies in the northwest Minneapolis–Saint Paul metropolitan area.
  • It aims to provide state funding (an appropriation) for the RTC’s development, operation, or both, with an accompanying requirement for a formal report detailing program specifics, outcomes, and accountability measures.

Key provisions (conceptual based on title and typical RTC funding bills)

  • Funding/Appropriation:
    • Appropriation of state funds dedicated to establishing and/or operating the Northwest Metro Regional RTC.
    • Potential allocation categories may include startup costs (equipment, communications infrastructure, data integration) and ongoing operating costs (staffing, IT, maintenance).
  • Regional Collaboration:
    • Framework for participation by multiple local law enforcement agencies within the Northwest Metro region (cities, counties, or incidentally tribal or regional partners).
    • Clear roles for partner agencies in governance, data sharing, and command-and-control during incidents.
  • Reporting Requirement:
    • A mandated report detailing program design, implementation milestones, budget usage, governance structure, privacy and civil liberties safeguards, data governance, and performance metrics.
    • The report may be due within a specified timeframe after funding is provided (e.g., within 6–12 months), with periodic updates thereafter.
  • Oversight and Accountability:
    • Provisions for oversight by a state public safety or finance policy committee, or a designated governing board.
    • Administrative rules or guidelines to ensure compliance with privacy, civil rights, and data security standards.
  • Operational Scope (typical RTC inclusions):
    • Real-time video and data analytics capabilities, incident monitoring, and interagency communications.
    • Data interoperability with existing state and local information-sharing platforms, subject to privacy protections.
    • Training and standard operating procedures for participating agencies.

Who is affected

  • Participating Law Enforcement Agencies: Cities, counties, and potentially tribal or regional agencies within the Northwest Metro region that would utilize the RTC and benefit from enhanced real-time information.
  • Public: Community members served by these agencies, with attention to privacy and civil liberties protections embedded in the program.
  • State Government: Agencies responsible for administering the appropriation, reporting requirements, and oversight (e.g., the Department of Public Safety and related fiscal committees).

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Introduction and Referral: Bill introduced on 2025-04-21 and referred to Public Safety Finance and Policy.
  • Legislative Process: As a finance-related public safety measure, it will likely undergo budgetary hearings, fiscal impact analysis, and policy review, with potential amendments from sponsors.
  • Reporting Timeline: The bill requires a report to be produced, with a specified reporting deadline tied to the funding or program commencement.

Potential impacts and considerations

  • Public Safety Impact: Potential improvements in rapid information sharing, incident response, and regional coordination during crises.
  • Cost and Fiscal Impact: State appropriation amount and ongoing costs; fiscal notes would detail anticipated expenditures, cost-sharing among participating jurisdictions, and long-term sustainability.
  • Privacy and Civil Liberties: The RTC would involve data collection and cross-agency surveillance capabilities; robust privacy protections, data governance policies, and oversight would be critical to address civil liberties concerns.
  • Governance: Successful implementation depends on clear governance, interoperable technology, and agreed-upon operating procedures among diverse agencies.

If you’d like, I can pull the bill’s fiscal note or draft a one-page plain-language explainer once the fiscal and policy details are available, or compare HF 3198 to similar RTC funding bills in other jurisdictions.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.