Allow area agency on aging to couple certain housing tax credits

136th Legislature (2025-2026) Introduced by Josh Williams

HB 925 establishes, modifies, or repeals state statutes affecting agencies, local governments, or regulated parties, with potential funding, rules, and enforcement changes.

Referred to committee

#aging #healthandhumanservices #housingandrealproperty #localgovernment #stateandlocalgovernment #taxation

Overview

HB 925 (Ohio, 136th General Assembly) is a bill sponsored with a co-sponsor by Josh Williams. The provided information does not include a title or textual language, so this summary focuses on typical legislative elements and the potential categories of impact such a bill could involve. If you can share the bill’s text or a summary from the sponsor, I can refine this accordingly.

Main purpose and intent

The bill appears to be a standard legislative measure introduced in the Ohio General Assembly. Without the full text, the exact policy objective is not specified here.

In general, bills with a sponsor and co-sponsor in Ohio aim to create, modify, or repeal statutes; allocate funds; or establish administrative procedures.

Key provisions and changes (typical categories)

Because the specific provisions are not provided, here are common elements that HB-type bills may include. Please provide the text for precise details.

Definitions and scope: Clarification of terms and the populations or entities affected.

Regulatory changes: Establishment, modification, or removal of regulatory requirements for state agencies, local governments, or private actors.

Funding or fiscal provisions: Appropriations, grants, transfers, or budgetary limitations.

Compliance timelines: Effective dates, transition periods, sunset clauses, or reporting requirements.

Enforcement and penalties: Penalties, enforcement mechanisms, or remedies for noncompliance.

Administrative procedures: Rulemaking authority, permits, licensing, inspections, or certifications.

Local impact: Provisions that authorize or restrict actions by municipalities, counties, or school districts.

Who would be affected

State agencies and their operations as impacted by new or amended statutory authority.

Local governments (cities, counties, school districts) if the bill alters local powers or funding.

Businesses, nonprofits, or professionals depending on regulatory or licensing changes.

Affected residents or specific populations if the bill targets services, eligibility, or protections.

Procedural and timeline aspects

Introduction and sponsorship: HB 925 introduced with Co-sponsor Josh Williams.

Committee process: Referral to a standing committee for hearings, amendments, and potential markup.

Floor consideration: If advanced, a vote by the full House of Representatives, then potential movement to the Senate.

Effective date: Possible immediate effect or a scheduled date after passage, with potential phase-in or transition periods.

Sunset or renewal provisions: Some bills include expiration dates or required reviews.

Potential impacts to watch

Budgetary implications: New spending, offsetting revenues, or shifts in state funding.

Regulatory burden: Changes that increase or reduce compliance costs for affected parties.

Implementation feasibility: Administrative capacity and timelines for agencies to implement new requirements.

Legal and constitutional considerations: Whether provisions raise conflicts with existing statutes or constitutional protections.

If you can provide the bill’s text, a summary, or a link to the Ohio Legislature’s page for HB 925, I will deliver a precise, section-by-section summary with exact provisions, fiscal impacts, affected parties, and key dates.