WeVote

Bill

Bill

SR 672

National Council of State Boards of Nursing

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Ana Maria Rodriguez

SR 672 about the National Council of State Boards of Nursing has no bill text; it died, with inconsistent procedural entries, likely a ceremonial, nonbinding resolution.

Died, not introduced
#s
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SR 672

Summary — SR 672: National Council of State Boards of Nursing

Quick facts

  • Bill number: SR 672 (Senate Resolution)
  • Title: National Council of State Boards of Nursing
  • Subject: s (no further subject detail provided)
  • Introduced/Filed: February 12, 2025 (filed); Received by Secretary of the Senate May 30, 2025
  • Status: Died, not introduced (final disposition: June 16, 2025)
  • Version content: No text provided in the materials reviewed

Purpose and intent

No legislative text or explanatory statement for SR 672 is available in the provided record. The title indicates the resolution concerns the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN), but because the bill version content is blank, the specific purpose — for example, recognizing NCSBN, expressing support for its work, requesting a study, or directing Senate action — cannot be determined from the public record supplied.

Key provisions (based on available record)

  • There is no substantive language or provisions available to summarize. The resolution record contains procedural entries but no bill text or enumerated provisions.

Who would be affected

  • If it followed typical practice for resolutions titled with an organization name, the primary subjects would likely be:
    • The National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN)
    • State boards of nursing and nursing professionals (if the resolution were declaratory or congratulatory)
    • Senate procedural records (if the resolution effected Senate action such as adoption of a report or referral)
  • Because no text is available, there is no way to identify legally affected parties or obligations.

Legislative history and procedural notes

The action history in the available record contains conflicting or unusual entries:
- 2025-02-12 — Filed
- 2025-05-03 — Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration (this predates some later entries)
- 2025-05-30 — Received by the Secretary of the Senate; also listed as "Introduced" on this date
- 2025-06-01 — Read & adopted; vote recorded in Journal; reported enrolled
- 2025-06-16 — Died, not introduced (final disposition)

These entries are internally inconsistent (for example, an item marked “indefinitely postponed and withdrawn” and later “read & adopted”), and the final status “Died, not introduced” conflicts with earlier actions that suggest the resolution was received and acted on. This suggests either clerical errors in the public log or subsequent procedural reversal. The lack of bill text prevents resolving these discrepancies.

Potential impact

  • Resolutions are commonly non‑binding and symbolic; they typically express the sentiment of a legislative body or recognize organizations or observances. If SR 672 were an ordinary resolution concerning NCSBN, its practical legal impact would likely be minimal and primarily ceremonial.
  • Without text, no regulatory, fiscal, or compliance impacts can be identified.

Recommendation / next steps

  • Consult the Senate clerk’s office or the official legislative website to obtain the full text/version of SR 672 and an authoritative explanation of the procedural history.
  • If you need an analysis tied to the resolution’s substance, provide the bill text or an official summary once available.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.