WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 1687

Moves the date of the presidential primary to the same date as the state primaries

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Brad Hoylman-Sigal and 1 co-sponsor

Allows out-of-state sellers to ship inert ammunition components to MA licensed buyers without MA §122B licensing, with ID verification on delivery.

REFERRED TO ELECTIONS
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 1687

Summary — S.1687 (2025): "An Act relative to the lawful sale of ammunition"

Overview / Purpose

S.1687 would amend Section 122B of Chapter 140 of the Massachusetts General Laws to exempt out‑of‑state companies from Massachusetts licensing requirements for the sale of certain ammunition components, and to explicitly permit those companies to sell and deliver specified “inert components” to licensees via mail, internet, or other interstate commerce methods. The change seeks to clarify how out‑of‑state sellers may lawfully ship specified ammunition parts into Massachusetts.

Note: bill text and some metadata in the record are inconsistent (see Procedural section). The substantive text filed and presented in the Senate addresses ammunition sales, not primary election dates.

Key provisions

  • Adds language to Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 140, §122B stating that a company located outside Massachusetts is not required to obtain a §122B license to sell specified ammunition components to Massachusetts licensees.
  • Permits out‑of‑state companies to sell and deliver “inert components” to persons properly licensed under sections 129B or 131 of chapter 140 via internet, U.S. Mail, or any other common interstate commerce method.
  • Requires that all deliveries of ammunition under this paragraph—whether in person or by common carrier—must:
    • Require the signature of the licensee, and
    • Require photographic identification of the licensee.
  • Defines “inert components” to include, but not be limited to: cases, bullets, shot, and wads.
  • Contains a “notwithstanding any special law or regulation to the contrary” clause to preempt local or special laws that would otherwise require out‑of‑state companies to be licensed.

Who would be affected

  • Out‑of‑state sellers/manufacturers of ammunition components (would no longer need a MA §122B license for specified sales).
  • Massachusetts residents who hold licenses under §129B or §131 (could receive inert components by mail/online from out‑of‑state sellers).
  • In‑state ammunition retailers and licensed dealers (potential competitive impacts).
  • Carriers and delivery services (must obtain licensee signature and verify photographic ID).
  • State and local law enforcement and regulators (implementation and enforcement responsibilities).

Procedural status & timeline (as recorded)

  • Bill introduced/entered: multiple docket entries (filed 1/15/2025; introduced in Senate 5/08/2025).
  • Read twice and referred to Committee on Finance (5/08/2025).
  • Earlier docket entries show referral to Public Safety and Homeland Security (2/27/2025) and status lines indicate "REFERRED TO ELECTIONS" (1/13/2025) — the legislative record contains inconsistent referral/status entries.
  • Hearings were scheduled and rescheduled for October 31, 2025 (Gardner Auditorium; virtual options), with cancellations and rescheduling noted.

Sponsors and related bills

  • Sponsors listed in the record (may contain inconsistencies): Todd Young (primary), Alyson M. Sullivan‑Almeida (cosponsor), Ryan C. Fattman (primary/presenter), Brad Hoylman‑Sigal (cosponsor), James Skoufis (primary).
  • Related/companion bills listed: HR 1, A 5058, SD 884 (replaces), prior‑session bills S 8108, S 1819, S 437.

Potential implications / considerations

  • Clarifies interstate sales of specified inert components, possibly increasing availability for licensed purchasers while preempting local licensing requirements for out‑of‑state sellers.
  • Does not explicitly include propellants or primers; items not listed (e.g., powder, primers, completed cartridges) may remain subject to existing licensing and shipment restrictions.
  • Enforcement will hinge on carrier verification of licensee identity/signature and on how “inert components” is interpreted in practice.
  • May affect market dynamics for in‑state dealers and raise questions about preventing diversion or unlawful reassembly into functioning ammunition if other components are obtained separately.

If you want, I can produce a one‑page legislative brief or compare this bill to prior related Massachusetts bills (S.1516, S.8108, etc.).

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.