WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HF 3677

Motorized trails receiving grants-in-aid closed to nonmotorized use unless designated for that use.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Cal Warwas

HF 3677 restricts grants-funded motorized trails to nonmotorized use unless specifically designated for motorized activity.

Introduction and first reading, referred to Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy
#motorcycles #snowmobiles #andatvs #naturalresourcesdepartment #parksandtrails
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 3677

Summary of HF 3677 (2025-2026) – Minnesota

Purpose and intent

HF 3677 proposes to restrict the use of motorized trails that receive grants-in-aid funding to nonmotorized activities unless the trail is explicitly designated for motorized use. The core aim is to ensure that trails funded with public grants are primarily used for nonmotorized recreation (e.g., hiking, biking, on foot) unless a clear designation allows motorized vehicles.

Key provisions and changes

  • Scope of applicability
    • Applies to motorized trails that receive grants-in-aid (public funding) from the state.
  • Use restrictions
    • Such trails would be closed to nonmotorized use unless the trail has an explicit designation permitting nonmotorized activities.
    • Conversely, the bill emphasizes motorized use only where the trail is designated for motorized activity; otherwise nonmotorized use is prioritized by default.
  • Designation process (implied)
    • Trails would require an official designation to permit nonmotorized use when funded with grants-in-aid. Without designation, nonmotorized use would be restricted.
  • Funding and oversight
    • Ties trail use to eligibility or continued eligibility for grants-in-aid funding, with potential policy alignment to ensure grant funds support designated uses.

Who/what would be affected

  • Motorized trail managers and operators receiving grants-in-aid, who would need to verify and comply with designation rules for allowable uses.
  • Nonmotorized users (hikers, bikers, foot travelers) on grant-funded trails may face restrictions unless a trail is officially designated for nonmotorized use.
  • State agencies and departments administering grants-in-aid would implement designation requirements and monitor compliance.
  • Potential habitats and land management outcomes could shift based on changes in use patterns, with implications for maintenance priorities and user conflicts.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Introduction and first reading: February 25, 2026.
  • Committee referral: Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy.
  • Sponsors: Co-sponsor Cal Warwas.

Note: The bill text, committee actions, amendments, and fiscal notes (if any) would provide additional details on implementation timelines, funding impacts, and enforcement mechanisms. Readers should consult the latest committee minutes and state legislative publications for any changes in status or substantive amendments.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.