Modifies the definition of sanctuary policy

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Josh Hurlbert and 1 co-sponsor

HB 3240 broadens or narrows Missouri’s “sanctuary policy” definition, altering local government and law enforcement obligations regarding immigration status cooperation.

Referred: Emerging Issues(H)

#immigration #politicalsubdivisions

Overview

HB 3240 (2026, Missouri) seeks to modify the definition of “sanctuary policy.” The bill has been introduced and referred to committee, with two co-sponsors: Josh Hurlbert and Mark Meirath. The legislative history shows introduction and first reading in February 2026, second-reading in February 2026, and referral to the Emerging Issues committee in May 2026.

Main purpose and intent

The bill aims to redefine or narrow/widen the concept of a “sanctuary policy” within Missouri law. While the exact statutory language is not provided here, such bills typically address how local governments and law enforcement interact with immigration status information, detentions, or cooperation with federal immigration authorities.

The intent suggested by the bill’s title is to modify the existing definition to affect how sanctuary policies are characterized, regulated, or prohibited in Missouri jurisdictions.

Key provisions and changes (as to be expected with a definition change)

Note: The precise text of HB 3240 is not provided in this summary. Based on common structure of sanctuary policy related bills, potential provisions may include:
- A revised definition of what constitutes a “sanctuary policy” by a city, county, or local agency.
- Specifications on restrictions or prohibitions regarding local cooperation with federal immigration enforcement (e.g., detainer requests, verification of immigration status, sharing of information with federal authorities).
- Clarifications about the applicability of existing state laws to local governments and law enforcement in regard to immigration status inquiries.
- Possible exemptions or carve-outs for specific programs, locations (e.g., schools, hospitals), or circumstances (e.g., exigent public safety needs).
- Potential penalties or enforcement mechanisms for jurisdictions that are deemed to maintain a sanctuary policy under the new definition.
- Procedures for how compliance or non-compliance would be determined and adjudicated.

Who would be affected

Local governments (cities, counties) and their law enforcement agencies in Missouri.

Public institutions and employees who may handle immigration information or cooperate with federal authorities.

Immigrant communities within Missouri, particularly those in jurisdictions that might be affected by changes to sanctuary policy definitions.

Procedural and timeline aspects

Introduction and First Reading: February 9, 2026.

Second Reading: February 10, 2026.

Referral to Committee: May 15, 2026 (Emerging Issues, H).

Next steps (not specified in the provided information): Committee hearings, potential amendments, floor votes in the House, and movement to the Senate (and eventual signature or veto).

Potential impacts to monitor

Scope of local cooperation with federal immigration enforcement may tighten or broaden depending on the final definition.

Regulatory clarity for jurisdictions seeking to comply with state policy or to avoid penalties under the revised definition.

Legal challenges or constitutional considerations if the definition intersects with federal immigration law or civil rights protections.

Budget and administrative implications for local agencies if new reporting, training, or compliance requirements are imposed.

If you can provide the exact text of HB 3240 or any committee substitute, I can deliver a more precise, line-item-style summary of the provisions and their practical effects.