SB 969 - This act modifies provisions relating to public safety. SEXUAL OFFENDERS WITHIN SCHOOL PROPERTIES (Section 566.149) This act provides that any person required to register as a tier III sexual offender who is a parent, legal guardian, or custodian of a student shall not be present in any school building, any real property that comprises a school, or any place where a school-related activity is taking place. This provision is identical to a provision in SB 134 (2025). RIGHTS OF VICTIMS OF CRIMES (Section 595.209) This act provides that victims of certain crimes under the age of 19 years old shall have the right to appear by video during any deposition or hearing in lieu of appearing in person. This provision is identical to a provision in SB 134 (2025). TRISTAN BENSON, JR.

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Travis Fitzwater

Missouri SB 969 modifies public safety provisions, currently under Judiciary Committee review with details pending.

Voted Do Pass S Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence Committee

Legislative bill overview

SB 969 is a Missouri bill that modifies provisions relating to public safety, though the specific provisions are not detailed in the available information. The bill was introduced by Senator Travis Fitzwater and is currently in the early stages of the legislative process, having passed first read and been referred to the Senate Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence Committee.

Why is this important

Public safety legislation directly affects law enforcement procedures, criminal justice processes, and community safety standards across Missouri. The modifications proposed could impact how police operate, how crimes are prosecuted, or how public safety resources are allocated, making this relevant to both criminal justice stakeholders and the general public.

Potential points of contention

Lack of transparency on specifics: Without access to the bill's actual text, it's impossible to evaluate whether proposed changes represent reform, expansion of law enforcement powers, or shifts in criminal justice procedures

Committee jurisdiction: Judiciary committee review suggests potential changes to criminal procedure, sentencing, or police authority—areas historically debated between public safety advocates and civil liberties groups

Early stage uncertainty: As the bill is still in committee with a hearing scheduled, its final language and provisions remain subject to amendment and negotiation