WeVote
Log In

Bill

TF

Bill

SB 968

SB 968 - Under this act, no pharmacy benefits manager shall prohibit or limit a covered person from selecting a pharmacy or pharmacist of their choice or impose a monetary advantage or penalty that would affect a covered person's choice if a pharmacy or pharmacist has agreed to participate in a covered person's health benefit plan. A pharmacy benefits manager shall not impose upon a pharmacy or pharmacist any course of study, accreditation, certification, or credentialing as a condition of participation that is inconsistent with, more stringent than, or in addition to what is required under state law. Additionally, a pharmacy benefits manager shall not pay or reimburse a pharmacy or pharmacist for an amount less than the most recently published National Average Drug Acquisition Cost (NADAC) for a prescription drug. This act requires a pharmacy benefits manager to reimburse pharmacies for a drug at an amount that is the greater of the maximum allowable cost (MAC) pricing or the current NADAC pricing. Additionally, no pharmacy benefits manager shall retaliate against a contracted pharmacy for exercising its right to appeal a reimbursement dispute to the pharmacy benefits manager. A pharmacy benefits manager shall reimburse any pharmacist or pharmacy located in this state for an amount equal to what the pharmacy benefits manager reimburses a pharmacy benefits manager affiliate for dispensing the same prescription drug. Finally, in addition to the reimbursement amounts determined by the MAC and NADAC, a pharmacy benefits manager shall reimburse a pharmacy or pharmacist a dispensing fee no less than 90% of the MO HealthNet professional dispensing fee in effect on the date of service. This act is similar to HB 1975 (2026). TAYLOR MIDDLETON

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Travis Fitzwater

DNR may use volunteer agreements to allow limited motorized vehicle use to maintain existing Patuxent River Wildland paths, preserving access while keeping wildland protections.

Bill Combined w/SCS SBs 984 & 968
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 968

Summary — SB 968 (Chapter 586, 2025)

Title: Howard County – Patuxent River Wildland – Use of Motor Vehicles and Mechanical or Motorized Equipment (Ho. Co. 5–25)

Purpose

SB 968 creates a narrow, statutory exception to normal wildland prohibitions on motorized vehicles/equipment for the Patuxent River Wildland. The intent is to allow the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to use limited motorized means — through volunteer use agreements — to maintain existing paths and ensure safe public access, while preserving the area’s wildland character.

Key provisions

  • Amends provisions of the Natural Resources Article (notably §5‑1212 and §5‑1203(h)) concerning State wildlands and the Patuxent River Wildland.
  • Authorizes DNR to enter into use agreements with volunteers to facilitate the use of motor vehicles and motorized equipment within the Patuxent River Wildland for the sole purpose of maintaining existing paths to ensure clear and safe access.
  • Confirms the Patuxent River Wildland designation (Type 2 wildland) and leaves intact general prohibitions on temporary roads, motorized transport, structures, and installations in State wildlands except as expressly provided.
  • Fiscal note language accompanying the bill also describes authority for DNR to use mechanical/motorized equipment to retain/maintain/remove/replace existing trails and to remove/replace/dispose of nonnative species for research, preservation, and education purposes. (The enacted chapter specifically codifies the volunteer use‑agreement pathway.)

Who/what is affected

  • DNR: gains a limited tool to facilitate path maintenance within the Patuxent River Wildland.
  • Volunteers: may be party to formal use agreements permitting motorized assistance for path upkeep.
  • Patuxent River Wildland: approximately 1,579 acres in Howard and Montgomery counties; remains a Type 2 wildland but with this targeted exception.
  • Public visitors: may benefit from clearer, safer access to trails; the change does not broadly alter wildland protections.

Fiscal and administrative impact

  • The Department of Legislative Services fiscal note states the bill does not directly affect State finances. No local or small business fiscal effect identified.
  • Administrative implementation would be handled by DNR through development and management of volunteer use agreements and any operational oversight needed.

Procedural & timing details

  • Introduced: January 29, 2025
  • Enacted: Approved by the Governor — Chapter 586 (signed June 20, 2025)
  • Effective date: September 1, 2025
  • Statutory changes: amendments to Article — Natural Resources, sections cited above.

Context/limitations

  • This is a narrowly drawn statutory exception limited to the Patuxent River Wildland and to maintenance of existing paths via volunteer agreements. Broader prohibitions on motorized use and development in State wildlands remain in force except where law expressly allows otherwise.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.