WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HF 1455

Minnesota River Basin Area II flood hazard mitigation funding provided, bonds issued, and money appropriated.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Paul Torkelson

HF 1455 finances flood hazard mitigation in Minnesota River Basin Area II through bonds and state funding for planning, design, and construction of risk-reduction projects.

Introduction and first reading, referred to Capital Investment
#bonds #waters-rivers
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 1455

Summary of HF 1455 (2025-2026) — Minnesota River Basin Area II Flood Hazard Mitigation Funding

What the bill seeks to do

HF 1455 would authorize funding for flood hazard mitigation in Minnesota River Basin Area II, including: issuing bonds to finance projects, appropriating money for those purposes, and establishing the framework for administering and deploying the funds.

Key aim: Improve flood risk reduction and resilience in the Area II segment of the Minnesota River Basin through capital investments and related financing mechanisms.

Main provisions and changes proposed

  • Capital funding and bond issuance

    • The bill authorizes the issuance of bonds to finance flood hazard mitigation projects within Minnesota River Basin Area II.
    • The bonding authority is tied to financing mechanisms for capital improvements designed to reduce flood risk and protect public safety and property.

  • Money appropriation and allocations

    • The bill appropriates state funds (specific dollar amounts are not provided in the summary text available here) to support Area II flood hazard mitigation projects.
    • Appropriations would be directed toward project planning, design, construction, and related activities necessary to implement mitigation measures.

  • Project scope and eligible uses

    • Eligible activities typically include structural and non-structural flood control measures, buyouts or relocations in flood-prone areas, drainage improvements, levee and channel modifications, and related risk-reduction projects.
    • The bill may outline criteria for project eligibility, prioritization, and alignment with state flood risk management goals.

  • Administration and oversight

    • Establishes or references a framework for administering the funding, including project selection processes, coordination with local jurisdictions, and reporting requirements.
    • Likely involves a state agency (often the Department of Natural Resources, Department of Public Safety, or a dedicated flood hazard mitigation authority) responsible for administering bonds and funds.

Who would be affected

  • Local governments and jurisdictions in Area II

    • Cities, counties, and special districts within Minnesota River Basin Area II would be primary beneficiaries, potentially participating in project development, matching funds, and local implementation.

  • Property owners and residents in flood-prone areas

    • Individuals and businesses in high-risk flood zones could benefit from mitigated flood risk, reduced damage potential, and enhanced community resilience.

  • State financing and administrative bodies

    • State agencies responsible for public finance, flood risk management, and project oversight would implement bond issuance, fund administration, and accountability measures.

Key procedural and timeline aspects

  • Introduction and referral

    • Introduced and referred to the Capital Investment committee on February 24, 2025.
    • Indicates the bill is in the early stages of the legislative process and will undergo committee review, potential amendments, and floor action.

  • Next steps in the process

    • Committee hearings, fiscal analysis, and potential companion bills or amendments.
    • If advanced, the bill would move to the broader floor for debate, votes, and eventual reconciliation with the Senate version (if any).

Notes and considerations

  • The summary above reflects the core elements typically associated with flood hazard mitigation bonding and appropriation bills in Minnesota. Specific dollar amounts, bond terms (e.g., interest rate, maturity), match requirements, project list, and reporting mandates would be defined in the bill’s text and any adopted amendments.
  • As introduced, the bill’s impact depends on the final language regarding eligible projects, funding levels, and governance structure for administering the bonds and funds.

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary to include any available fiscal note, schedule, or specific policy language once you provide the full bill text or fiscal details.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.