WeVote

Bill

Bill

HB 5884

Marihuana: licenses; certain licenses for medical and recreational marihuana; modify. Amends title & secs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 9a, 11a, 12, 13, 14, 15 & 17 of 2018 IL 1 (MCL 333.27951 et seq.); adds secs. 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 24a, 25, 26, 27 & 28 & repeals secs. 10, 11 & 16 of 2018 IL 1 (MCL 333.27960 et seq.).

2023-2024 Regular Session Introduced by Joe Aragona and 15 co-sponsors

HB 5884 updates Michigan cannabis law to modernize medical/adult-use licenses, boost safety and transparency, and expand banking access for licensed businesses.

referred to second reading
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 5884

Summary — HB 5884 (Substitute H-2)

Title: Marihuana: licenses; certain licenses for medical and recreational marihuana; modify. (Amend 2018 IL 1 — Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act)

Status & procedural history
- Introduced: June 27, 2024 (Rep. Jimmie Wilson).
- Substitute (H‑2) reported with recommendation: December 10, 2024; referred to second reading.
- Referred to Joint Committee on Education: January 22, 2025.
- The bill amends large portions of the 2018 Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (2018 IL 1, MCL 333.27951 et seq.), adds multiple new sections (20–28), and repeals sections 10, 11, and 16 of the 2018 Act.

Purpose and intent
- Update and clarify Michigan’s adult‑use and medical marihuana regulatory framework, with particular emphasis on licensing.
- Continue to legalize possession, cultivation, transfer, and use of marihuana for persons 21 and older while creating/adjusting a regulated commercial market for cultivation, processing, testing, transportation, and retail sales.
- Ensure licensing, public‑health safety, diversion prevention to minors, product safety/security, and the taxation/regulation of commercial marihuana activity.
- Affirm and preserve the state agency’s ability to enter into agreements with federally recognized Indian tribes.

Key substantive changes and provisions (high level)
- Title and numerous statutory sections are amended to modernize terminology (e.g., consistent use of “cannabis regulatory agency”/“department”) and to align the statute with current administrative organization.
- Expands and clarifies definitions: for example, detailed definitions for “applicant” (including specified owners, managers, spouses, and thresholds for disclosure), “adulterated marihuana,” “industrial hemp” (THC ≤ 0.3% definitions), and “financial institution” and “financial service.” These broadened definitions increase transparency requirements and address banking/financial access issues for the regulated industry.
- Establishes or codifies multi‑tier grower license classes (Class A, B, C growers referenced) and adds new statutory sections (20–28) creating or revising specific state license categories and related authority. The bill therefore restructures licenses and clarifies which licenses apply to medical, adult‑use, or both.
- Adds administrative authority and procedural detail (rulemaking and department duties), and strengthens regulatory tools aimed at product safety and security of licensed premises.
- Repeals several existing statutory sections of the 2018 Act (secs. 10, 11, 16), which will change or eliminate prior provisions—impacts depend on the content of those specific sections.

Who is affected
- Adults 21+ (users and personal growers).
- Medical marihuana patients and caregivers (potential changes to licensing and business interplay between medical and adult‑use market).
- Existing and prospective marihuana businesses (growers, processors, transporters, testers, retailers) — including ownership disclosure and potential reclassification of licenses.
- Cannabis Regulatory Agency (department) — expanded/clarified rulemaking and enforcement roles.
- Local governments (zoning/licensing interaction), financial institutions (definitions intended to facilitate banking relationships), and federally recognized tribes (ability to enter compacts/agreements).

Potential impacts and considerations
- Regulatory alignment: the bill appears intended to harmonize medical and adult‑use licensing and to provide clearer categories for commercial activity, which could ease business operations or require existing licensees to convert/comply with new categories.
- Transparency and eligibility: expanded applicant disclosures and ownership thresholds will increase transparency but may impose new compliance obligations on businesses.
- Public health and safety: clarified definitions (e.g., adulteration) and explicit safety/security goals suggest increased enforcement focus on product safety and diversion prevention.
- Banking and finance: explicit definitions of “financial institution” and “financial service” may be aimed at improving access to banking for cannabis businesses.
- Tax and revenue: the bill reaffirms authority to tax commercial marihuana operations and retail sales — potential state and local revenue effects depend on final tax provisions (not fully excerpted).

Notes and next steps
- This summary is based on the Substitute H‑2 text excerpts and bill header; the full text of added sections (20–28) and repealed sections would be needed to state precise license sizes, fees, conversion rules, timelines, penalties, and other operational details. Consult the complete bill text (H‑2) and subsequent amendments for technical specifics and implementation timelines.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.