WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SF 4909

Manufactured home park residents eviction proceedings modifications

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Jim Abeler and 4 co-sponsors

Minnesota bill modifies manufactured home park eviction procedures to strengthen tenant protections and establish new notice and dispute resolution requirements for park residents.

Pursuant to Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 6, referred to Rules and Administration
#landlordsandtenants #legalproceedings #realestate
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SF 4909

Legislative bill overview

SF 4909 modifies the eviction process for residents of manufactured home parks in Minnesota by establishing new procedural requirements and protections. The bill likely includes provisions affecting notice periods, grounds for eviction, and dispute resolution mechanisms specific to manufactured home tenancies. These changes aim to address the unique vulnerabilities of manufactured home residents, who often have limited mobility due to the cost and logistics of relocating their homes.

Why is this important

Manufactured home residents face distinct housing security challenges compared to traditional renters—while they may own their dwelling, they rent the land beneath it, creating power imbalances with park owners. Eviction can be economically devastating since moving a manufactured home costs thousands of dollars, effectively forcing residents to abandon their property. Procedural protections in eviction law can significantly impact housing stability for this economically vulnerable population.

Potential points of contention

  • Park operator concerns: Manufactured home park owners may argue that heightened eviction protections limit their property rights and ability to enforce lease terms or manage operations efficiently
  • Scope of "just cause" requirements: Disagreement over which reasons constitute valid grounds for eviction (nonpayment, lease violations, park closure) and how strictly these standards should be applied
  • Notice period length: Tension between resident protection (longer notice periods) and operator flexibility (shorter timelines to address problems or redevelop property)

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.