WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

A 2642

Mandates the use of advanced safety technology in vehicles in the state and requires the commissioner of motor vehicles to promulgate certain rules and regulations

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Chris Burdick and 6 co-sponsors

Mandates advanced safety tech in vehicles sold or operated in the state; DMV to set rules, timelines, and enforcement, clarifying eligible vehicles and tech.

REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · A 2642

Summary: Assembly Bill A 2642 – Mandating Advanced Safety Technology in Vehicles

Status: Referred to Transportation
Introduced: January 21, 2025
Bill Type: Assembly bill (A)
Related bills: S 9528 (prior-session); A 4057 (prior-session); S 3832 (companion)

Purpose and intent

  • A 2642 aims to require the use of advanced safety technology in vehicles within the state and to authorize the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to develop the implementing rules and regulations. The overarching goal is to enhance road safety through mandated technology components in vehicles sold or operated in the state (specifics to be defined in rulemaking).

Key provisions (highlights)

  • Mandate: Establishes a state-level requirement for advanced safety technology in vehicles. The exact technologies and scope (e.g., new vehicles, existing fleets, or all vehicles) are to be determined through subsequent DMV rulemaking.
  • Regulatory authority: Directs the DMV Commissioner to promulgate rules and regulations necessary to implement, enforce, and administer the mandate. This includes defining compliance standards, timelines, and enforcement mechanisms within the state.
  • Rulemaking process: The bill delegates significant detail to administrative rules, meaning future regulations will specify:
    • Which vehicles are subject to the requirements
    • Technical specifications or performance standards for the required safety technologies
    • Compliance dates and phased adoption (if any)
    • Penalties or remedies for noncompliance
  • Relationship to other legislation: The bill is part of a broader set of related bills (S 9528, A 4057, S 3832) that may address similar topics or serve as companion measures in the Senate; some references appear as companion bills in prior sessions.

Who is affected

  • Vehicle manufacturers and distributors: may be required to certify or install specified advanced safety technologies in vehicles sold in the state.
  • Vehicle dealers and fleets: could face compliance obligations or labeling requirements related to the mandated systems.
  • Vehicle owners and drivers: ultimately benefits from enhanced safety features; may incur costs associated with compliance or changes in vehicle eligibility.
  • DMV and law enforcement: will implement and enforce the new standards, requiring administrative capacity and potential enforcement actions.

Implementation timeline and process

  • As introduced and currently in the Transportation Committee, the bill’s specifics are to be defined through DMV rulemaking. A full timeline will depend on:
    • Passage by the Legislature
    • Governor’s signature (if applicable)
    • Subsequent regulatory rulemaking process (public notice, hearings, comment periods)
  • The initial legislative action recorded is the 2025-01-21 referral to Transportation.

Potential impact and considerations

  • Safety: Potential improvement in road safety through standardized advanced safety features.
  • Industry costs: Possible costs for manufacturers, dealers, and fleets to comply with new standards; may influence vehicle pricing and market offerings.
  • Regulatory complexity: The rulemaking process will determine the exact scope, ensuring feasible implementation and clear enforcement mechanisms.
  • Public and stakeholder engagement: Rulemaking will likely involve stakeholder input, including automakers, consumer groups, and safety advocates.

Next steps to watch

  • Movement through the Transportation Committee (hearings, amendments).
  • Publication of the DMV rulemaking framework outlining covered technologies, compliance dates, and enforcement details.
  • Any related Senate companion actions (e.g., S 3832) that may signal broader legislative alignment.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.