WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 2310

Local Education Agencies - As introduced, prohibits LEAs and public charter schools that serve students in any of the grades kindergarten through five from allowing students to access digital devices at school, from allowing employees to use a digital device to provide instruction, and from administering assessments to students in an electronic format except in certain circumstances. - Amends TCA Title 49.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by Joey Hensley

Tennessee bill bans digital device use in K-5 schools except limited exceptions, eliminating student technology access and electronic assessments statewide.

Signed by Governor.
#localeducationagencies
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 2310

Legislative bill overview

SB 2310 prohibits local education agencies and public charter schools serving kindergarten through fifth grade from allowing students to use digital devices during school, prevents teachers from using digital devices for instruction, and restricts electronic testing—with limited exceptions. The bill amends Tennessee's education code (TCA Title 49) and has already passed the Senate unanimously with amendments.

Why is this important

This legislation directly affects how approximately 2.8 million Tennessee elementary students learn and how teachers deliver curriculum. The restrictions could fundamentally reshape classroom instruction methods, assessment practices, and access to educational technology that many districts have integrated into their programs. Implementation would require significant curriculum redesign and potential resource reallocation.

Potential points of contention

  • Educational effectiveness debate: Research presents mixed findings on device use in early elementary; supporters cite reduced screen time benefits while critics note lost access to proven digital learning tools and accessibility aids for students with disabilities
  • Exception clarity: The bill allows assessments in "certain circumstances" but doesn't clearly define what qualifies, potentially creating implementation confusion across districts
  • Equity and accommodation concerns: Students relying on assistive technology or digital tools for learning disabilities may face barriers; English language learners using digital resources could be disadvantaged
  • Teacher autonomy and curriculum flexibility: Restricts pedagogical choice and may conflict with existing curricula or professional judgment about instructional methods
  • Implementation costs: Districts may incur expenses redesigning lessons, training staff, and potentially purchasing non-digital alternatives

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.