WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

H 3584

Local (Darlington County)

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Robert Williams

Massachusetts bill bars new natural gas facilities or expansions within 5 miles of environmental-justice communities, with limited public-safety carveouts.

Referred to Committee on Ways and Means
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · H 3584

Summary — H 3584 (Hybrid content)

Note: The bill text provided appears to combine two distinct measures. One is a Massachusetts-style act that would restrict expansion of natural gas facilities near environmental justice communities. The other is a South Carolina joint resolution authorizing transfer of ownership of Dargan’s Pond (Darlington County) from Clemson University to Francis Marion University. This summary treats both components separately and flags this likely drafting/administrative overlap.

Purpose

  • Massachusetts component: Establish a near‑ban on new natural gas facilities and expansions of existing gas facilities or gas-fired generating facilities when any part of the facility would be within a 5‑mile radius of an “environmental justice” neighborhood/community — with a narrow public‑safety exception in some provisions. Also adds local protections in towns without operating gas companies.
  • South Carolina component: Authorize transfer of ownership of Dargan’s Pond (approx. 50 acres, Pee Dee Research & Education Center, Darlington County) from Clemson University to Francis Marion University, subject to conditions.

Key provisions — Massachusetts component

  • Amendments to Chapter 164:
    • Sections 69J and 69K: Prohibit approval or issuance of certificates for any new gas facility or expansion if any part falls within a 5‑mile radius of an environmental justice neighborhood, except where required for public safety (language varies across versions).
    • Sections 69J¼ and 69K½: Prohibit approval/granting of petitions for new gas‑generating facilities or expansions within a 5‑mile radius of an environmental justice neighborhood/community (no explicit safety exception in some clauses).
    • Section 30 amendment: replace the words “a gas or” with “an” (technical edit).
    • New Section 86A: In towns where no gas company operates (no local gas manufacturer/seller), no gas company or other person may excavate streets/roads to construct a gas facility.
  • Redline indicates this was drafted against prior 193rd-session language (H.3237/S.2135) and contains duplicated/alternate phrasings.

Key provisions — South Carolina component

  • Authorizes the SC Department of Administration (or successor) to transfer ownership of Dargan’s Pond from Clemson to Francis Marion University upon mutual consent and execution of an agreement.
  • Transfer contingent on FMU securing appropriated/allocated funds or resources sufficient for necessary pond/area repairs.
  • Agreement may be non‑monetary; FMU assumes responsibility for the pond and repairs and will cooperate with SC Emergency Management Division and FEMA to seek grant funding.
  • Transfer effective upon governor’s approval; no further state agency approvals required.

Who would be affected

  • Massachusetts: natural gas utilities, developers of gas infrastructure and gas‑fired generation, state regulators (utility/energy permitting authorities), municipalities, and communities designated as environmental justice neighborhoods within five miles of proposed projects; towns without gas service would gain a local protection against street excavation for gas infrastructure.
  • South Carolina: Clemson University, Francis Marion University, local educational programs (freshwater ecology), and local stakeholders in Darlington County.

Procedural / timeline notes

  • Introduced/prefiled: prefiled 12/12/2024; introduced/read first time 01/14/2025.
  • Referred to: Committee on Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy; also recorded as referred to Ways and Means.
  • Senate concurred entries dated 02/27/2025 (record shows duplication).
  • Hearings scheduled: originally for 11/13/2025 (multiple entries and a rescheduling note).
  • Classification listed as a joint resolution; legislative actions show both Massachusetts and South Carolina procedural language — indicating possible clerical conflation.

Potential impacts and considerations

  • Massachusetts-style restrictions would significantly limit siting and expansion of gas infrastructure within broad (5‑mile) buffers around environmental justice communities, affecting energy planning, utility capital projects, and emissions trajectories; could prompt legal and regulatory challenges regarding energy reliability and statutory authority.
  • The town‑street excavation ban would protect municipalities without existing gas service from involuntary infrastructure construction, but could affect regional gas expansion strategies.
  • SC pond transfer would reassign stewardship and maintenance liability for an approximate 50‑acre lake to Francis Marion University, contingent on funding for repairs.

If you’d like, I can draft a one‑page fiscal/regulatory impact outline for the Massachusetts provisions (jurisdictional authorities affected, likely permitting delays, estimated project deferrals) or produce a clean, single‑measure summary separating the two items for submission to committee staff.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.