WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 4732

LEAD-SAFE WATER ACT

104th Regular Session Introduced by Mike Crawford and 2 co-sponsors

Requires regular lead testing, prompt notification, and remediation in drinking water, prioritizing high-risk communities to reduce lead exposure.

0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 4732

Bill Overview

HB 4732 (Session 104th, Illinois) is titled the Lead-Safe Water Act. The bill is sponsored in part by co-sponsors Mike Crawford, Lilian Jiménez, and Marcus Evans. The primary aim is to protect public health by reducing lead exposure from drinking water, with requirements for testing, remediation, and safeguards for affected communities.

Purpose and Intent

  • Establish a framework to identify, prevent, and mitigate lead contamination in drinking water.
  • Ensure timely testing of drinking water, transparent reporting of results, and effective remediation actions.
  • Promote equity by prioritizing communities at higher risk of lead exposure, including indoor plumbing and premise-level concerns.

Key Provisions and Changes

  • Lead Testing and Monitoring

    • Require regular testing of drinking water supplies for lead across applicable facilities and premises (e.g., schools, child care facilities, and possibly other public buildings).
    • Specify testing methodologies, sampling protocols, and frequency (details may specify thresholds triggering action).

  • Notification and Reporting

    • Mandate prompt notification to affected residents and institutions when lead levels exceed established standards.
    • Create reporting requirements to state agencies and potentially public dashboards to share testing results and remediation status.

  • Remediation and Mitigation

    • Establish timelines and responsibilities for corrective actions to reduce lead levels.
    • Require consideration of remediation options, such as corrosion control measures, replacement of lead-containing fixtures or service lines, and prompting replacement programs where appropriate.
    • Potentially allocate or authorize funding mechanisms to support remediation projects, equipment upgrades, and related programs.

  • Grant and Funding Programs

    • Create or expand state grant programs to support lead-safe water projects in identified facilities and communities.
    • Prioritize low-income communities or areas with higher historical exposure to lead in water.

  • Compliance and Enforcement

    • Set penalties or enforcement measures for non-compliance with testing, reporting, or remediation requirements.
    • Outline the roles of relevant state agencies in inspection, oversight, and enforcement.

  • Education and Training

    • Provide education for facility operators, building owners, and the public about lead exposure risks and steps to minimize exposure.

  • Coordination with Federal Standards

    • Align or harmonize with federal Safe Drinking Water Act standards and EPA guidance where applicable.

Who Would Be Affected

  • Public schools, child care facilities, and other institutions serving children or vulnerable populations.
  • Residential buildings, particularly those with older plumbing systems containing lead pipes or fixtures.
  • Property owners, facility managers, and water system operators responsible for testing and remediation.
  • Local governments and state agencies tasked with administration, funding, and enforcement.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Establishes a framework for ongoing testing cycles and remediation timelines (exact frequencies and deadlines would be specified in the bill text).
  • Creates mechanisms for reporting and public disclosure within defined timeframes after testing and after remediation actions are implemented.
  • Includes potential implementation timelines for funding programs, grant cycles, and compliance milestones.

Potential Impacts

  • Public Health: Aims to reduce lead exposure in drinking water, protecting children and vulnerable populations.
  • Infrastructure: Encourages or requires updates to plumbing systems, corrosion control, and water delivery infrastructure.
  • Fiscal: Introduces or expands funding and grant programs; possible state expenditure for implementation and enforcement.
  • Equity: Prioritizes at-risk communities to address environmental justice concerns related to lead exposure.

Note: This summary reflects the bill’s stated objectives and typical provisions found in lead-safe water legislation. For precise statutory language, specific treatment thresholds, dates, funding amounts, and implementation timelines, consult the official bill text and amendments.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.