WeVote

Bill

Bill

HF 2501

Lead prohibited in ammunition for hunting and in fishing tackle, nontoxic standard established for shooting facilities and school shooting sports, and money appropriated.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Alex Falconer and 6 co-sponsors

Prohibits lead in hunting ammunition and fishing tackle and establishes non-toxic standards for shooting facilities and school programs, funded by state appropriations.

Author added Vang
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 2501

Summary of HF 2501 (2025-2026) – Lead Prohibition and Non-Toxic Standards; Shooting Facilities and School Shooting Sports; Funding

Purpose and Intent

HF 2501 proposes a series of environmental and public health measures aimed at reducing lead exposure in hunting, fishing, and shooting-related activities. The core aims include prohibiting lead in hunting ammunition and in fishing tackle, establishing non-toxic standards for shooting facilities, and creating a funding mechanism to support implementation and related activities, including school shooting sports programs. The bill is introduced in the Minnesota House and referred to the Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy committee.

Key Provisions

  1. Lead Prohibition in Hunting Ammunition

    • Prohibits the use of lead-based ammunition for hunting.
    • Establishes a transition framework toward non-lead ammunition (non-toxic alternatives) for hunters.
    • Potential timelines or dates for compliance (to be specified in the bill text).
  2. Lead Prohibition in Fishing T tackle

    • Prohibits lead in fishing tackle or gear.
    • Encourages or requires the adoption of non-lead tackle materials (e.g., tin, steel, tungsten, brass, polymer composites).
    • May include grace periods or exemptions for existing stock or specific fishing scenarios.
  3. Non-Toxic Standards for Shooting Facilities

    • Establishes standards for shooting ranges and facilities to ensure non-toxic practices.
    • Could cover facility operations, surface management, and remediation practices to prevent lead contamination.
    • Aims to reduce environmental lead, particularly in ranges where spent ammunition accumulates.
  4. Non-Toxic Standards for School Shooting Sports

    • Applies non-toxic lead standards to school shooting sports programs or facilities.
    • Ensures that school-related activities meet environmental safety standards regarding lead exposure.
  5. Funding and Appropriations

    • Includes appropriation of state funds to support the above measures.
    • May allocate dollars for:
      • Transition assistance for hunters and anglers to adopt non-lead alternatives.
      • Grants or loans to shooting facilities to implement non-toxic standards.
      • Programs supporting school shooting sports compliance and related educational initiatives.
      • Environmental monitoring and enforcement activities.
  6. Enforcement and Compliance

    • Likely provisions on enforcement mechanisms for lead prohibitions and non-toxic standards.
    • Potential penalties or fines for violations (to be detailed in the bill).
    • Timelines for compliance and reporting requirements to the legislature.

Affected Parties and Impacts

  • Hunters and Anglers: May need to switch to non-lead ammunition and fishing tackle; potential costs and access considerations during transition.
  • Shooting Facilities (Public and Private Ranges): Required to meet non-toxic standards; may need capital improvements, ongoing maintenance, and compliance reporting.
  • Schools with Shooting Sports Programs: Must align with non-toxic standards; may influence facility upgrades, equipment procurement, and safety practices.
  • Environment and Public Health: Expected reduction in environmental lead contamination and associated health risks, especially in water bodies and shooting range sites.
  • State and Local Agencies: Responsible for enforcement, compliance verification, monitoring, and administration of funding.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Introduction and First Reading: March 17, 2025; referred to Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy.
  • Author Additions: Subsequent amendments/additions on February 17, 2026 (Vang as author).
  • Committee Consideration: Likely to undergo hearings and potential amendments in the Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy committee, with a funding bill pathway given the appropriation component.
  • Implementation Timeline: Specific dates for compliance (e.g., dates by which lead ammunition and tackle must be phased out) would be defined in the bill text and any accompanying fiscal notes or schedules.

Notes

  • The bill’s exact language will specify the allowed transitions, exemptions (if any), and compliance dates.
  • The fiscal impact would be detailed in the accompanying appropriation and fiscal note, outlining expected costs for state agencies, producers, facilities, and schools, as well as any anticipated savings from reduced environmental and health risks.

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary to focus on particular sections (e.g., enforcement provisions, cost estimates, or transition timelines) once the bill’s full text is available.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.