WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 334

Law enforcement: training; mental health and law enforcement response training; require for law enforcement officers. Amends title of 1965 PA 203 (MCL 28.601 - 28.615) & adds secs. 9f & 9g. TIE BAR WITH: SB 341'25

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Sarah Anthony and 9 co-sponsors

Michigan bill requiring all law enforcement officers to complete mandatory mental health crisis response training to improve police handling of psychiatric and substance abuse emergencies.

REFERRED TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE WITH SUBSTITUTE (S-1)
#health:substanceusedisorder #lawenforcement:training #mentalhealth:other #stateagencies(existing):boardsandcommissions #stateagencies(existing):statepolice
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 334

Legislative bill overview

SB 334 amends Michigan's law enforcement training requirements to mandate mental health crisis response training for all law enforcement officers. The bill adds new sections to the 1965 Public Act 203 establishing standards and requirements for this specialized training, and is tied to companion legislation (SB 341) for coordinated implementation.

Why is this important

Mental health crises represent a significant portion of police calls for service, and inadequate officer training can lead to tragic outcomes, unnecessary arrests, or escalation of volatile situations. Requiring standardized mental health training can improve officer response to individuals experiencing psychiatric emergencies, substance abuse crises, or suicidal ideation, potentially reducing harm and improving public safety outcomes for both officers and civilians.

Potential points of contention

  • Implementation costs and timeline – Requiring comprehensive mental health training for all existing officers statewide involves significant fiscal burden for police departments and may strain training resources during the implementation period
  • Training standards definition – The bill's effectiveness depends on establishing appropriate curriculum standards; unclear or overly broad standards could result in inconsistent quality across departments, while overly prescriptive standards may face resistance from law enforcement
  • Scope and alternatives – Questions about whether mental health crisis response should always involve armed police officers, or whether co-responder models (pairing officers with mental health professionals) would be more effective, potentially creating implementation conflicts

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.