WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

AB 284

Law enforcement: Racial and Identity Profiling Advisory Board (RIPA).

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Juan Alanis

AB 284 narrows reportable police stops and overhauls RIPA, adding DA/POST reps, trimming civil-rights/community seats, and mandating peer-reviewed, location-based stop analysis.

In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
#lawenforcement #racialandidentityprofilingadvisoryboard(ripa)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · AB 284

AB 284 (Alanis) — Summary

Status: Introduced January 22, 2025. Most recent action: In committee; hearing postponed (May 7 & May 14, 2025). Re-referred to Assembly Appropriations May 5, 2025. (As amended; read second time and amended April 30, 2025.)

Purpose / Intent

AB 284 makes targeted changes to California’s law-enforcement "stop" data collection and reporting regime and modifies the membership and reporting requirements of the Racial and Identity Profiling Advisory Board (RIPA). The stated aims are to (1) narrow the statutory definition of reportable “stops,” (2) alter RIPA’s composition to include prosecutorial and active POST representation, and (3) strengthen the rigor and transparency of RIPA’s annual stop‑data analysis through additional analyses, peer review, and an explicit dissent process.

Key provisions

  • Changes to the definition of “stop” for reporting to the Attorney General:

    • Excludes certain interactions from the statutory definition of “stop,” including, by example, officer contacts that result from a call for service and detentions necessary to prevent serious bodily injury or death. (The bill describes other exclusions as well.)
    • Note: These changes may reduce or change the universe of interactions that must be reported, and could change statewide stop statistics.

  • RIPA membership changes:

    • Adds as members: the president of the California District Attorneys Association (or designee) and a Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) member who is an active peace officer (if not already on RIPA).
    • Reduces representation counts for certain categories: human or civil rights tax‑exempt orgs (from 2 to 1), community organizations (2 to 1), and religious clergy (2 to 1).
    • Removes authority that allowed the Governor, Senate Pro Tem, and Assembly Speaker to each appoint up to two additional members.

  • RIPA reporting and review requirements:

    • Requires RIPA’s annual report to include an analysis of stops where persons were stopped in geographic locations different from where they live, work, or attend school.
    • Requires the report to undergo peer review by two separate entities prior to publication; the bill prescribes how at least one of those peer reviewers is chosen.
    • Allows any RIPA member to cause a dissenting opinion to be included in the report and authorizes RIPA to include a response to that dissent.

  • Data and confidentiality:

    • Retains existing public‑access constraints (agencies must not transmit personally identifying information and certain officer identifiers are withheld), consistent with existing stop‑data law.

Who is affected

  • State and local law enforcement agencies and peace officers (reporting scope may change).
  • Attorney General’s Office (receives and publishes stop data; involved in regulations historically).
  • RIPA and its stakeholders (composition and report processes change).
  • Community, civil-rights, and religious organization representatives (fewer seats).
  • California District Attorneys Association and POST (direct representation added).
  • Local agencies may face administrative changes; if duties increase, the bill would create a state‑mandated local program.

Fiscal / procedural notes

  • The bill states that if the Commission on State Mandates finds the measure creates state‑mandated costs, reimbursement shall be made under existing statutory procedures.
  • Digest metadata: Majority vote; no appropriation; fiscal committee review required.
  • Procedural history highlights: multiple committee referrals and amendments; hearings postponed most recently (May 2025).

Potential impacts / issues to watch

  • Data completeness: narrowing the “stop” definition could reduce reported stop counts and change analyses of racial/identity profiling trends.
  • Governance: adding prosecutors and active POST representation and reducing community/clergy seats may shift RIPA’s institutional balance.
  • Analytical rigor: peer review and new location‑based analyses could increase credibility and complexity of RIPA’s annual reports.
  • Administrative burden: changes to reporting or analyses could increase workload for local agencies, triggering reimbursement questions.

This summary highlights substantive changes in AB 284 as amended through April–May 2025.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.