WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 485

Invalid Restrictive Covenants with Physicians

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Kelly Skidmore

Bill would have prohibited Florida healthcare employers from enforcing non-compete and non-solicitation agreements against physicians to increase practice mobility and market competition.

Died in Health Professions & Programs Subcommittee
#subjectindex
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 485

Legislative bill overview

HB 485 would have invalidated restrictive covenants (non-compete and non-solicitation agreements) imposed on physicians in Florida. The bill sought to prevent healthcare providers from using these contractual restrictions to limit where physicians could practice or which patients they could treat after employment ends.

Why is this important

Restrictive covenants can significantly impact physician mobility, patient access to care, and competition in healthcare markets. By restricting where doctors can work, these agreements may limit patient choice, reduce competition that could lower healthcare costs, and create barriers for physicians relocating within the state or starting independent practices.

Potential points of contention

  • Business protections vs. worker freedom: Healthcare organizations argue restrictive covenants protect their investments in recruiting and training physicians; opponents say they unfairly restrict physicians' ability to earn a living
  • Patient access concerns: Supporters contend these restrictions limit physician choice and may leave underserved areas without providers; opponents argue established physician networks shouldn't be disrupted
  • Enforceability standards: Debate over what constitutes reasonable vs. unreasonable restrictions on practice location and duration, and whether Florida law should categorically ban them rather than evaluate reasonableness case-by-case

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.