WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HF 5

Imposition and allocation of certain taxes modified, tax analysis required, transportation funding impacts analysis required, retail delivery fee repealed, unlimited Social Security subtraction provided, previous appropriation and transfer modified, reports required, money transferred, and money appropriated.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Keith Allen and 30 co-sponsors

Represents a broad fiscal package expanding an unlimited Social Security subtraction while repealing a retail delivery fee and mandating tax and transportation funding analyses.

Author added Repinski
#taxation #transportationandtransportationdepartment
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 5

Summary of HF 5 (Minnesota, 2025-2026)

Note: The bill title indicates a broad set of fiscal and transportation-related provisions, including tax imposition/allocation, tax analysis, transportation funding impact analysis, repeal of a retail delivery fee, an unlimited Social Security subtraction, modifications to prior appropriations and transfers, required reports, and related money transfers and appropriations. The following summary reflects the committee and sponsor notes available in the action history and title. Where specific numerical details are not provided in the material presented, the summary notes that information is not currently specified.

1) Purpose and Intent

  • The bill appears to be aimed at restructuring certain state taxes and funding mechanisms, enhancing transparency through required tax and transportation-related analyses, modifying prior appropriations and transfers, and adjusting Social Security subtraction rules for individual income taxes.
  • It also proposes changes to retail tax-related charges (specifically repealing a retail delivery fee) and directs reports and transfers related to these fiscal changes.

2) Key Provisions and Changes (as implied by title and actions)

  • Imposition and allocation of certain taxes modified:
    • The bill would modify how certain state taxes are imposed and how the resulting revenue is allocated. The exact tax types affected are not enumerated in the provided material.
  • Tax analysis required:
    • Requires a formal analysis of taxes, potentially including impacts, distributions, and economic effects. The scope (which taxes, methodology, timing) is not specified in the material provided.
  • Transportation funding impacts analysis required:
    • Mandates analysis of how funding changes affect transportation programs and projects. This suggests a focus on ensuring transportation funding decisions are informed by quantified impact assessments.
  • Retail delivery fee repealed:
    • Repeals a previously enacted retail delivery fee. The specific fee (amount, date of enactment, who collects) is not detailed here.
  • Unlimited Social Security subtraction provided:
    • Proposes an unlimited subtraction for Social Security benefits from taxable income, or a similar mechanism, removing the usual cap or phase-in limits. The exact application (individual income tax vs. another tax, income thresholds) is not given.
  • Previous appropriation and transfer modified:
    • Changes to how prior appropriations and transfers are authorized or administered. Details on which programs or funds are affected are not provided.
  • Reports required:
    • Requires reports related to the above provisions (likely tax, fiscal, and transportation analyses). Specific reporting timelines and content requirements are not listed.
  • Money transferred and money appropriated:
    • Indicates shifts in money transfers between funds or accounts and additional appropriations. Details on the amounts and recipient funds are not specified.

3) Affected Parties and Stakeholders

  • State government agencies responsible for:
    • Tax administration and policy (likely Department of Revenue and the Legislature’s fiscal committees).
    • Transportation finance and policy (Department of Transportation and related accounting offices).
  • Taxpayers:
    • Individuals who would benefit from an unlimited Social Security subtraction (potentially reducing taxable income for many retirees).
    • Retail consumers and businesses indirectly affected by the repeal of the retail delivery fee.
  • State programs funded by taxes and transportation allocations:
    • Programs that rely on the reallocated or newly analyzed tax revenue and transportation funding.

4) Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Introduction and first reading on February 6, 2025; referred to Transportation Finance and Policy.
  • Committee activity:
    • February 13, 2025: Committee report to adopt as amended and re-refer to Taxes.
    • March 3, 2025: Committee report to adopt as amended and re-refer to Transportation Finance and Policy (indicating cross-committee consideration and possible amendments).
    • April 9, 2026: Author added Repinski (suggesting continued activity and sponsorship updates).
  • Sponsors and co-sponsors:
    • A broad coalition of representatives, including Repinski and many co-sponsors, indicating cross-committee and cross-issue support.
  • Overall process:
    • The bill has undergone multiple committee referrals and amendments, suggesting a complex package with interconnected fiscal provisions and policy aims. Final status would depend on floor action and potential conference committee if the Senate is considering companion legislation.

5) Potential Impacts and Considerations

  • Tax impacts:
    • The unlimited Social Security subtraction could significantly affect the after-tax incomes of retirees and many middle-income seniors, potentially reducing state revenue from the Personal Income Tax unless offset by other measures.
    • Tax analysis requirements may improve transparency and inform future legislative decisions.
  • Transportation funding:
    • Analyses could influence how transportation funds are allocated, potentially prioritizing certain projects or programs.
  • Retail delivery fee repeal:
    • Restores a tax or fee-free environment for certain retail transactions, potentially reducing state revenue in the short term.
  • Fiscal management:
    • Revisions to appropriations and transfers suggest a rebalancing of funds, with implications for program funding and state accounts.
  • Reporting:
    • Regular reporting requirements should improve accountability and oversight of tax changes and transportation funding.

If you would like, I can tailor this summary to focus on a specific aspect (e.g., tax provisions only, transportation provisions only) or compare HF 5 to any introduced companion or current law references if you provide those texts.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.