WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

A 3490

Imposes an excise tax on sugary drinks

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Anna Kelles and 2 co-sponsors

Imposes a sugary drink excise tax; manufacturers, distributors, and retailers would bear the cost, likely raising consumer prices and funding state programs.

REFERRED TO WAYS AND MEANS
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · A 3490

Summary of Bill A 3490 – Excise Tax on Sugary Drinks

Overview

  • Bill number: A 3490
  • Title / purpose: Imposes an excise tax on sugary drinks. The exact definitions, rate, exemptions, and administration would be set forth in the bill text.
  • Status: Referred to the Ways and Means Committee (fiscal review and revenue impact focus).
  • Introduced: January 28, 2025
  • Sponsorship:
    • Primary sponsor: Karines Reyes
    • Co-sponsors: John Zaccaro Jr. (cosponsor), Anna Kelles (cosponsor)
  • Related bills:
    • Prior-session: A 9925, A 6857, A 5107
    • Companion: S 2330 (listed as a companion in Senate)

Key Provisions (as stated)

  • The bill would enact an excise tax on sugary drinks. Specifics such as what beverages qualify, the tax rate, exemptions, and administration are not provided in the available summary and would be defined in the full bill text.
  • As a Ways and Means referral bill, the proposal anticipates fiscal impacts and revenue considerations, with details to be outlined during committee review.

Who Would Be Affected

  • Manufacturers, distributors, and retailers of sugary drinks: likely subject to the tax at the point of production or sale, depending on the bill’s defined mechanism.
  • Consumers: potential price impacts reflected in beverage prices.
  • State and local governments: anticipated revenue for eligible programs, contingent on the final revenue allocation provisions.
  • Businesses small or large: depending on exemptions and thresholds, may face varying compliance burdens.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • The bill was introduced on January 28, 2025 and immediately referred to Ways and Means, indicating a fiscal analysis focus.
  • The duplication of the referral action within the same day reflects standard committee routing rather than a legislative move.
  • The existence of several related and companion bills (A and S variants, including prior-session measures) suggests ongoing interest and potential cross-chamber negotiation in future sessions.

Context and Next Steps

  • The full bill text would define the scope, rate, exemptions, enforcement, and revenue allocation.
  • Watch for committee hearings or amendments in Ways and Means to understand how the tax would be structured and funded.
  • For readers interested in the precise provisions, monitoring the official bill text and committee agenda will provide definitive details.

If you’d like, I can pull out the exact definitions, rate, and allocation once the full bill language is available.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.