WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 466

Implements escalating penalties for vehicles which have been documented multiple times by a photo violation monitoring device for failure to comply with traffic-control indications

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Brad Hoylman-Sigal

Expands protections for elders by broadening abuse definitions, expanding caretaker roles, clarifying state agency duties, and strengthening reporting and anti-retaliation remedies

REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 466

Summary — S.466 (2025): "An Act protecting vulnerable elders from abuse"

Note: The bill text filed with the Senate docket (No. 466) is titled “An Act protecting vulnerable elders from abuse.” (There is inconsistent metadata in the materials provided that references a different traffic-related title; this summary follows the bill text on elder protection.)

Purpose / Intent

The bill strengthens Massachusetts’ statutory framework for identifying, reporting, investigating and remedying abuse and neglect of elderly persons. It clarifies and expands definitions (abuse, caretaker, state agency), adjusts mandated‑reporting protections and anti‑retaliation remedies, and directs the Department on its role in elder services and home care program development.

Key provisions (by section)

  • Section 1 — Department role (amends G.L. c.19A, §4): designates the Department as the principal Commonwealth agency to marshal human, physical, and financial resources to plan, develop, and implement programs to ensure dignity and independence of elderly persons, including a home care program for communities.

  • Section 2 — Definition of “Abuse” (amends G.L. c.19A, §14): broadens the definition to include:

    • acts/omissions causing serious physical or emotional injury or financial exploitation;
    • failure/inability/resistance of a caretaker to provide necessities essential to physical/emotional well‑being when safety is compromised;
    • similar failure/inability/resistance when the elderly person self‑neglects.
    • Preserves a religious‑treatment exception (care following tenets of a church).
    • Addresses elderly persons in prisons/houses of correction: physical contact that harms is not automatically deemed abuse if it occurs within official duties per 103 C.M.R. and the force was necessary; however, physical contact used for retaliation is defined as abuse.

  • Section 3 — Definition of “Caretaker” (amends G.L. c.19A, §14): expands caretaker to include family, voluntary/contractual caregivers, and fiduciaries; explicitly includes persons/agencies responsible for elders in custodial/residential facilities except where the facility is licensed under specific sections (G.L. c.111, §§51, 57D, 71). Persons responsible for involuntarily committed elders under chapter 123 are caretakers regardless of facility licensing.

  • Section 4 — Definition of “State agency” (new): defines state agency broadly to include Commonwealth agencies and municipal entities, and private agencies providing elder services under contract.

  • Section 5 — Reporting, immunity, and anti‑retaliation (amends G.L. c.19A, §15):

    • Reporter immunity: mandated reporters are immune from civil/criminal liability for reports unless they perpetrated the abuse; other reporters get immunity if acting in good faith (exceptions for perpetrators).
    • Anti‑retaliation: prohibits discharge, demotion, transfer, reduction in pay/benefits, negative evaluations or other retaliatory actions against employees, clients or others for filing reports, testifying, or cooperating. Remedies include treble damages, costs and attorney’s fees; state agencies cannot assert sovereign immunity as a defense. Willful false reporting/testimony removes protection.
    • Report contents (partial text): requires name, contact address, approximate age of the elder, nature/extent of abuse, caretaker name if known, medical treatment info, and other relevant details (full list truncated in provided text).

Who is affected

  • Elderly persons in Massachusetts (including those in community, residential, custodial, and correctional settings)
  • Caretakers: family members, paid caregivers, fiduciaries, and certain facility staff/agencies
  • State and municipal agencies and private contractors who provide elder services
  • Mandated reporters (health/social‑service professionals, facility staff) and other reporters
  • Employers and agencies (subject to anti‑retaliation provisions and potential treble damages)

Procedural status & timeline (as provided)

  • Introduced in Senate: 2025‑02‑06
  • Read twice and referred to Committee on Finance: 2025‑02‑06
  • Referred to Committee on Elder Affairs: 2025‑02‑27
  • Hearing scheduled: 06/24/2025, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM (B‑1)
  • Referred (per order) to Committee on Aging and Independence: 2025‑06‑27
  • Status in docket: REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION (appears in metadata; likely clerical inconsistency)

Notes and limitations

  • Provided bill text is truncated (Section 5(f) and later portions are incomplete). There may be additional provisions, penalties, programmatic details, or conforming changes not visible here.
  • Some supplied metadata (title, sponsors, committee referrals) contains inconsistencies; readers should consult the official enrolled or full bill text and the Legislative Information System for authoritative details and any amendments.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.