WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SF 971

Immunity from criminal liability for health care providers when providing health treatment and services establishment

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Jim Abeler and 3 co-sponsors

SF 971 grants Minnesota healthcare providers criminal immunity for good-faith medical treatment, potentially reducing liability exposure but raising accountability concerns.

Author added Seeberger
#healthandhealthdepartment #liability #occupationsandprofessions
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SF 971

Legislative bill overview

SF 971 proposes to grant criminal liability immunity to healthcare providers when delivering medical treatment and services within their scope of practice. The bill would protect doctors, nurses, and other licensed health professionals from criminal prosecution for actions taken in good faith during patient care, provided they follow established medical standards and protocols.

Why is this important

Healthcare providers currently operate under potential criminal liability for treatment decisions, which can create defensive medicine practices and hesitation in emergency care situations. This immunity framework could affect how providers approach high-risk procedures, emergency interventions, and treatment of complex cases, while also influencing malpractice litigation and patient safety outcomes.

Potential points of contention

  • Scope of protection: Defining what constitutes "good faith" medical practice and whether immunity applies to experimental treatments, off-label medications, or non-standard protocols
  • Patient safety safeguards: Concerns that broad immunity could reduce accountability for negligent, reckless, or grossly incompetent care that harms patients
  • Liability shifting: Questions about whether immunity simply redirects liability to healthcare institutions, insurance companies, or leaves patients without recourse for provider misconduct
  • Consistency with existing law: How this interacts with current malpractice protections, informed consent requirements, and mandatory reporting of professional misconduct

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.