WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 2409

Holidays and Days of Special Observance - As introduced, enacts the "No Pride Flag or Month Act." - Amends TCA Title 4; Title 5; Title 6; Title 7; Title 15; Title 20 and Title 49.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by Joey Hensley

Tennessee bill prohibits state display of pride flags and official recognition of Pride Month across government and educational institutions, raising free speech and equal protection concerns.

Failed in Senate State and Local Government Committee
#holidaysanddaysofspecialobservance
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 2409

Legislative bill overview

SB 2409, titled the "No Pride Flag or Month Act," amends multiple sections of Tennessee law to prohibit the display of pride flags and the official recognition of Pride Month across state government, educational institutions, and potentially other entities. The bill restricts the use of state resources and property for displaying symbols or observing designations related to LGBTQ+ pride.

Why is this important

This legislation would directly affect LGBTQ+ visibility and recognition in public institutions, workplaces, and government spaces throughout Tennessee. It raises constitutional questions about free speech, religious liberty, and equal protection, while also having practical implications for state employees, students, and the public regarding what symbols and observances are permitted in public settings.

Potential points of contention

  • Free speech and expression concerns: Critics argue the bill restricts symbolic speech protected under the First Amendment, while supporters contend the state shouldn't use resources to promote particular viewpoints
  • Educational impact: Opponents worry about effects on school climate and LGBTQ+ student safety; proponents argue schools should remain neutral on contested cultural issues
  • Government neutrality definition: Disagreement exists over whether not displaying pride flags constitutes neutrality or constitutes state action against a specific group
  • Practical enforcement: Questions about how broadly the prohibition would apply (employee pins, classroom diversity discussions, historical curriculum) and who determines violations
  • Constitutional validity: Legal scholars dispute whether such restrictions withstand existing First Amendment and equal protection jurisprudence

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.