Bill
H 3683
Direct MassDOT to study and preserve infrastructure for a future direct BRT linking Kendall Square, Allston/North Brighton, and Longwood, with route options and expected benefits.
Note on source documents
- The materials provided appear to combine two distinct items: (1) a Massachusetts bill filed as House No. 3683 (sponsored by Rep. Kevin G. Honan) directing the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) to study a potential direct Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) connection among Kendall Square, Allston/North Brighton and the Longwood Medical Area; and (2) a separate ceremonial South Carolina House resolution honoring the Heathwood Hall girls cross country team. This summary focuses on the Massachusetts measure (the substantive legislative text). The South Carolina resolution is ceremonial and unrelated to the Massachusetts transit study; a brief note about it is included at the end.
Purpose and intent
- Direct MassDOT to conduct a comprehensive transit service assessment to guide planning and preservation of infrastructure needed to establish at least one future direct Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) alternative connecting:
- Kendall Square (Cambridge)
- Allston and North Brighton (Boston)
- Longwood Medical Area (Boston)
- The study aims to identify necessary infrastructure preservation actions, assess use of existing rights-of-way, examine interactions with nearby transportation and development projects, define market demand, and evaluate regional economic benefits.
Key provisions
- Scope of assessment:
- Identify transit infrastructure that should be preserved to enable future direct BRT alternatives.
- Review prospects for constructing and operating BRT on existing rights-of-way.
- Analyze the impacts of nearby transportation and development projects that are planned, designed, funded, or under construction.
- Define the potential market/demand for the proposed transit services.
- Evaluate potential economic benefits to the region and Commonwealth.
- Recommendations:
- MassDOT must recommend preferred route(s) and approaches to preserve the infrastructure necessary for at least one direct BRT alternative between the named areas, taking into account nearby projects already studied or underway.
- Reporting:
- The department is required to file a report with the clerks of the House and Senate, the House and Senate Committees on Ways and Means, and the Joint Committee on Transportation.
- The bill text includes a deadline of “not later than July 31, 2022” for filing the report. This date appears to be a drafting error given the bill’s 2025 filing; the statutory deadline may be updated during committee consideration.
Who would be affected
- Potentially affected parties include:
- Transit riders and commuters traveling among Kendall Square, Allston/North Brighton, and the Longwood Medical Area (research, academic, medical staff, students, patients).
- Employers, research institutions, hospitals and universities located in Kendall Square and Longwood Medical Area.
- Municipalities and developers in Cambridge and Boston, especially projects in Allston and North Brighton that may affect rights-of-way.
- MassDOT and regional planning agencies tasked with implementing recommendations.
- Note: the bill requests a study and recommendations only; it does not authorize construction, appropriate funds for BRT, or change regulatory authority by itself.
Procedural and timeline notes
- Introduced/Filed: House docket shows filing on 1/16/2025; sponsor Rep. Kevin G. Honan.
- Committee actions (from provided actions):
- Referred to the House Committee on Transportation (2/27/2025).
- Senate concurred (2/27/2025).
- Hearing scheduled 9/16/2025 (B-2).
- Reported favorably by committee and referred to House Ways and Means (11/18/2025).
- The report filing deadline in the bill text (July 31, 2022) conflicts with filing dates in 2025 and likely will be corrected or clarified during legislative consideration.
Potential impacts
- Short term: establishes an analytic basis for preserving corridors and rights-of-way to keep future BRT options viable.
- Medium to long term: if recommendations are adopted and funded, could enable a fast, direct BRT link that improves regional connectivity between major innovation and medical centers, potentially reducing car trips, supporting economic activity, and influencing land-use and development decisions along the corridor.
- The bill itself does not commit funding or initiate construction; it guides planning and preservation actions.
Related bill
- HD 3173 is listed as replaced by this filing.
Appendix — separate item (ceremonial)
- The file also includes a South Carolina House resolution recognizing the Heathwood Hall girls cross country team for winning the 2024 SCISA state championship. That resolution is purely ceremonial and does not relate to the Massachusetts transit study.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.
