HEALTH/ACC INSURANCE: Provides for health insurance. (8/1/26)
Insurers cannot override a treating provider’s medically necessary care with lower-cost substitutes, unless the alternative is clinically appropriate and standards-based.
Insurers cannot override a treating provider’s medically necessary care with lower-cost substitutes, unless the alternative is clinically appropriate and standards-based.
SB 363 seeks to protect insured individuals from being forced to accept a lower level of care that would be contrary to the treating provider’s determination. It establishes a standard that health insurance issuers cannot override medically necessary treatment decisions based primarily on cost-containment or utilization management criteria, except when the substitute care meets generally accepted standards of medical practice and is clinically appropriate.
If you’d like, I can tailor this summary for a specific audience (advocacy groups, insurers, or policymakers) or add a brief comparison to similar protections in other states.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.