WeVote

Bill

Bill

HF 342

Haven for Heroes funding provided, and money appropriated.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Peggy Scott and 1 co-sponsor

HF 342 appropriates funds to establish or sustain Haven for Heroes programs supporting veterans and active-duty service members.

Introduction and first reading, referred to Legacy Finance
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 342

Summary of HF 342 (Session 2025-2026) – Minnesota

Title

Haven for Heroes funding provided, and money appropriated.

Purpose and Intent

HF 342 seeks to provide funding for a program or initiative described as the “Haven for Heroes.” The bill appears to authorize state appropriations to support this program, ensuring financial resources are available to carry out its activities and objectives. The exact nature of the Haven for Heroes program (e.g., services, target beneficiaries, and operating structure) is not specified in the provided summary; however, the title indicates a focus on support for veterans, active-duty service members, or related veteran/community initiatives.

Key Provisions and Changes

Based on the title and typical structure of appropriations bills, the following elements are likely to be included or considered by HF 342:

  • Authorization of Funding: Direct appropriation of state funds to establish or continue Haven for Heroes activities.
  • Budget and Allocation Details: Specific dollar amounts, funding sources (e.g., general fund, dedicated funds), and duration of the appropriation (e.g., one-year, multi-year).
  • Program Components: Potential programs or services funded (e.g., housing assistance, mental health resources, employment support, case management, or transitional services for veterans and their families).
  • Administration and Oversight: Designation of administering agency (likely a state veterans affairs department or a related agency), reporting requirements, and accountability measures.
  • Conditions and Restrictions: Any eligibility criteria for beneficiaries, matching requirements, or restrictions on how funds may be used.
  • Reporting and Evaluation: Requirements for periodic reports to the legislature detailing expenditures, outcomes, and program effectiveness.

Who Would Be Affected

  • Beneficiaries: Veterans, active-duty military personnel, National Guard members, or their families who are directly served by Haven for Heroes activities.
  • State Agencies: The agency responsible for veterans affairs or similar state departments that would administer and oversee funding and program delivery.
  • Taxpayers and Legislature: Through budgetary implications, reporting requirements, and potential oversight obligations.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Introductory Status: Introduced and referred to Legacy Finance on February 13, 2025.
  • Next Steps in Committee: As a legacy finance bill, it would typically move through hearings and potential amendments in the Legacy Finance committee before advancing to the broader House floor for a vote.
  • Sponsor Information: Primary sponsors include Peggy Scott and Zack Stephenson (co-sponsors), indicating bipartisan or cross-party support interests typical for veterans-related issues.

Observations and Considerations

  • The provided information does not include specific dollar figures, program design details, or dates beyond the introduction. For a complete understanding, the follow-up would be to review the bill’s fiscal note, committee documentation, and any amendments, which would outline:
    • The exact appropriation amount and funding mechanism.
    • The administrative structure and performance metrics.
    • Eligibility criteria and instructions on fund usage.
    • Sunset provisions or renewal requirements, if any.

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary to include anticipated fiscal figures or to compare HF 342 with similar prior-year bills, once you provide the full text or fiscal note.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.