WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

A 3413

Grants each of the representatives of the counties of Dutchess, Putnam, Orange and Rockland a vote during the proceedings of the metropolitan transportation authority

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Didi Barrett and 4 co-sponsors

Gives Dutchess, Putnam, Orange and Rockland county reps voting power in MTA proceedings, boosting suburban upstate influence on governance and funding priorities.

REFERRED TO CORPORATIONS, AUTHORITIES AND COMMISSIONS
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · A 3413

Summary of New York Assembly Bill A 3413

Overview

Bill A 3413 proposes to grant voting rights to the representatives of four upstate counties—Dutchess, Putnam, Orange, and Rockland—in proceedings of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA). The measure aims to expand voting representation within the MTA's processes for these counties’ officials.

  • Bill number: A 3413
  • Title: Grants each of the representatives of the counties of Dutchess, Putnam, Orange and Rockland a vote during the proceedings of the metropolitan transportation authority
  • Status: Referred to the Assembly Committee on Corporations, Authorities and Commissions
  • Introduced: January 27, 2025
  • Legislative actions:
    • 2025-01-27: Referred to Corporations, Authorities and Commissions (listed twice)
  • Primary sponsor: Christopher Eachus
  • Cosponsors: Karl Brabenec, Latrice Walker, Didi Barrett, Matthew Slater
  • Related bills: Several prior-session A-bills (A 1824, 1194, 407, 9786, 459, 2080, 202, 2545) and Senate companion S 5749

Purpose and Intent

The core intent of A 3413 is to alter the voting dynamics of the MTA by ensuring that the county representatives from Dutchess, Putnam, Orange, and Rockland Counties have a vote in MTA proceedings. This represents a shift toward broader regional representation on matters governed or adjudicated by the MTA, which historically has been dominated by New York City-area representation.

Key Provisions (highlights)

  • Grants voting rights to elected representatives from four counties (Dutchess, Putnam, Orange, Rockland) during MTA proceedings.
  • Clarifies that these county representatives would have the same voting status as other MTA participants involved in official decisions, subject to the authority’s governance framework.
  • Would likely necessitate amendments to existing statutes governing the MTA’s board and proceedings to formalize how these representatives participate and vote.

Note: The bill text itself is not provided here, so the exact mechanism (which body within the MTA these votes would come from, how appointments would be made, and whether voting thresholds adjust) is not specified in the available summary.

Who Is Affected

  • Primary beneficiaries: Residents of Dutchess, Putnam, Orange, and Rockland Counties, who would gain increased influence over MTA policy and decisions through their county representatives’ votes.
  • Affected entities: Metropolitan Transportation Authority, four county legislatures, and potentially other stakeholders within the MTA governance framework.
  • Potentially affected groups: Riders and taxpayers in the four counties who rely on MTA services and funding decisions.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Introduction date: January 27, 2025.
  • Current status: Referred to the Assembly Committee on Corporations, Authorities and Commissions (committee stage; no floor action indicated).
  • Related legislation: Several companion or related measures exist in prior sessions (A 1824, 1194, 407, 9786, 459, 2080, 202, 2545) and Senate companion S 5749, indicating ongoing interest in restructuring MTA governance.

Potential Impacts and Considerations

  • Governance: Could shift policy influence toward suburban counties, potentially affecting budget priorities, service planning, fare discussions, and capital projects at the MTA.
  • Legal/structural: Would require statutory amendments to the MTA’s governance framework; questions about appointment processes, term lengths, and voting procedures would need to be resolved.
  • Fiscal: No fiscal impact details are provided in the summary; changes could influence funding allocations and project prioritization.
  • Political dynamics: May provoke debate over equity, regional representation, and the balance between New York City-centric governance and upstate/suburban interests.

Next Steps for Readers

  • Monitor committee action in the Assembly for A 3413 to see whether it advances, is amended, or stalls.
  • Review the text for specifics on how the voting rights would be implemented (appointment process, quorum, voting rules).
  • Compare with related bills (A 1824, A 1194, A 407, etc., and S 5749) to understand evolving proposals on MTA governance.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.