Government electronic devices
Requires Massachusetts school transport contracts with EVs to honor all IFB criteria when awarding bids, ensuring non-price factors (safety, lifecycle, charging) are used.
Requires Massachusetts school transport contracts with EVs to honor all IFB criteria when awarding bids, ensuring non-price factors (safety, lifecycle, charging) are used.
Title: An Act relative to school transportation contracts
Lead sponsor: Representative Meghan K. Kilcoyne (12th Worcester)
Filed/Introduced: Prefiled 12/05/2024; introduced and read first time 01/14/2025
Current status / actions:
- Referred to Committee on Judiciary (01/14/2025); later referred to State Administration and Regulatory Oversight (02/27/2025)
- Senate concurred (02/27/2025)
- Member Oremus added as sponsor (04/08/2025)
- Hearing scheduled: 07/15/2025, 1:00–5:00 PM (room B‑1)
Related bill: HD 1229 (replaced)
Note on extraneous content: The legislative text provided includes unrelated language from a South Carolina draft concerning restrictions on certain mobile applications; that South Carolina material is not part of Massachusetts H 3369. The operative Massachusetts text is summarized below.
H 3369 seeks to clarify procurement requirements for school transportation contracts that include electric vehicles (EVs). The bill directs procurement officers to take into account all evaluation criteria that are set forth in the invitation for bids (IFB) when awarding such contracts. The intent appears to be ensuring that non‑price factors specified in an IFB (for example, technical, safety, maintenance, or lifecycle considerations related to EVs) are actually used in the award decision.
If you’d like, I can: (a) draft model IFB language to comply with this requirement, (b) outline sample evaluation criteria and weightings for EV school bus procurements, or (c) track subsequent committee action and amendments.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.