WeVote
Log In

Bill

CN

Bill

SB 371

Generally revise agriculture laws - MT made products

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Cora Neumann

SB 371 sought to revise Montana agriculture laws governing "Made in Montana" product standards but died in the legislative process after missing revenue bill deadlines and facing taxation committee concerns.

(S) Died in Process
#agriculture(seealso:livestock;taxation--agriculture/livestock) #revenue #state #sales #taxation(generally) #taxation--individualincome
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 371

Legislative bill overview

SB 371 proposed revisions to Montana's agriculture laws with a focus on "Made in Montana" product standards and labeling requirements. The bill aimed to strengthen regulations around agricultural product designation and potentially create marketing or certification frameworks for Montana-origin goods.

Why is this important

Montana's agricultural sector is economically significant, and clear "Made in Montana" standards affect farmers, processors, and consumers. Such legislation can influence market competitiveness, consumer trust, and the ability of producers to command premium prices for locally-sourced goods—or conversely, impose compliance costs on small operators.

Potential points of contention

  • Revenue implications: The bill was tabled in the Taxation Committee and missed the revenue bill deadline, suggesting fiscal concerns about implementation costs or potential tax impacts that proved contentious.
  • Definition disputes: Agriculture bills involving product origin claims often face disagreement over what percentage local content requires, which ingredients qualify, and how strict compliance monitoring should be.
  • Regulatory burden on producers: Smaller farms and processors may have opposed new certification or labeling requirements as costly administrative overhead compared to larger competitors.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.