WeVote

Bill

Bill

SJR 160

General Assembly, Statement of Intent or Position - Encourages Tennessee's teachers to use the names Gulf of America and Mount McKinley in classroom instruction. -

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by Bo Watson

The resolution urges Tennessee educators to use the renamed terms Gulf of America and Mount McKinley in classroom instruction, framing it as guidance rather than a mandate.

Assigned to General Subcommittee of Senate Finance, Ways, and Means Committee
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SJR 160

Summary of Senate Joint Resolution 160 (SJR 160), Tennessee 114th General Assembly

Purpose and intent

  • SJR 160 is a concurrent resolution that expresses the Tennessee General Assembly’s endorsement of teaching about two items under new names.
  • It requests (encourages) Tennessee teachers, particularly geography instructors, to use the renamed terms “Gulf of America” and “Mount McKinley” when educating students about these natural features.
  • The resolution cites executive orders attributed to President Donald J. Trump (dated January 20, 2025, and February 9, 2025) that allegedly renamed:
    • Mount McKinley to its traditional or alternative name (as stated in the bill’s narrative) in association with recognizing leadership and historical events.
    • The continental shelf area named “Gulf of America,” extending to the seaward boundary with neighboring nations, as a pivotal economic resource.
    • A designated “Gulf of America Day” on February 9, 2025, to commemorate “American pride in the history of American greatness.”
  • The resolution asserts alignment with the President’s view that naming national treasures should honor patriotic Americans and historical contributions.

Key provisions and changes

  • The bill does not enact new laws or create regulatory requirements. Instead, it:
    • Encourages Tennessee educators to adopt the renamed terms (Gulf of America and Mount McKinley) in classroom instruction.
    • Positions itself as guidance or a statement of educational emphasis rather than a binding mandate.
  • It explicitly states the intent to reference these renamed geographic features in educational settings.

Who/what is affected

  • Primary beneficiaries: Tennessee public and private school students, particularly those in geography or social studies classes.
  • Affected entities: Tennessee teachers and school districts, which would receive a policy signal encouraging usage of the renamed terms in curriculum and instruction.
  • Since it is a resolution, it does not create penalties or require state agencies to implement enforcement; rather, it aims to influence educational content and classroom discussion.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • History:
    • Introduced and referred on February 24, 2025.
    • Passed on second consideration on February 27, 2025, and referred to Senate Finance, Ways & Means Committee (as part of the normal legislative process for concurrent resolutions that may involve fiscal implications).
    • On April 16, 2026, placed on the Senate Finance, Ways, and Means Committee calendar for consideration on April 20, 2026.
  • Co-sponsor: Senate member Bo Watson.
  • The bill’s narrative relies on executive orders attributed to the President in 2025, which is a matter of interpretation and not a direct effect of Tennessee law.

Potential impact and considerations

  • Educational impact: Encourages a shift in terminology used in classroom instruction, which could influence students’ familiarity with the historical naming of geographic features.
  • Legal/operational impact: As a resolution, it does not create enforceable requirements or funds; its impact rests on educational culture and curricular practice.
  • Controversy and reception: The proposed renamings are not universally recognized or adopted; the resolution frames the terms as honors to patriotic figures and national history, which may spark discussion about accuracy, historical naming conventions, and cross-jurisdiction usage.

Note: The summary reflects the bill’s text and stated intent. It does not endorse or oppose the renaming itself but outlines its content, scope, and potential implications.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.