WeVote

Bill

Bill

HB 2664

GATA-MUNICIPALITIES

104th Regular Session Introduced by Kyle Moore

Illinois HB 2664 exempts municipalities with populations of 5,000 or fewer from GATA requirements, reducing small-town grant oversight.

0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 2664

Below is a concise, objective summary of the materials you provided. The document appears to contain two different measures that share the same bill number (HB 2664) but originate in different states; each is summarized separately.

Overview / Note

The file includes two distinct HB 2664 measures:
- An Arizona appropriation bill (appropriates funds to Gila County sheriff)
- An Illinois amendment to the Grant Accountability and Transparency Act (GATA)

Both are presented below with their principal provisions, affected parties, and procedural points.

Arizona — HB 2664 (Introduced Feb 11, 2025)

Title: Appropriation; Gila County; sheriff

Summary
- Purpose: Provide one-time state funding to the Gila County Sheriff’s Office for maintenance and operations.
- Key provision: Appropriates $3,000,000 from the State General Fund in FY 2025–2026 to the Arizona Department of Administration to distribute to the Gila County Sheriff’s Office for maintenance and operation of the office.
- Affected parties: Gila County Sheriff’s Office (recipient); Arizona Department of Administration (distributor); Arizona State General Fund (payer).
- Fiscal effect: $3,000,000 increase in appropriations for FY 2025–2026 (no offsets or conditions specified in the text provided).
- Timing / procedure: Introduced Feb 11, 2025. Status noted as Rule 19(a) / Re‑referred to Rules Committee. Distribution timing and any usage conditions are not specified in the bill text provided.

Sponsors
- David Marshall, Sr. (primary)
- Walt Blackman (cosponsor)

Illinois — HB 2664 (Introduced Feb 6, 2025)

Title/Synopsis: Amend Grant Accountability and Transparency Act (30 ILCS 708/45)

Summary
- Purpose: Narrow the scope of Illinois’ Grant Accountability and Transparency Act (GATA) by exempting certain small municipalities from GATA requirements.
- Key provisions:
- Amends Section 45 (Applicability) of the Grant Accountability and Transparency Act.
- Adds an explicit exemption so that the Act does not apply to State and federal pass‑through awards to municipalities with a population of no greater than 5,000.
- Confirms recognition of federal guidelines under 2 CFR Part 200 and states that federal statutes/regulations govern where they differ from the Act.
- States the amendment applies to pending actions as well as actions commenced on or after the effective date.
- Includes a subsection clarifying that State funds may be used for federal match / maintenance of effort.
- Retains other cross‑references and clarifications about applicability to higher education, monitoring duties for grant‑making agencies, and ARPA Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Fund awards (subject only to applicable federal law).
- Affected parties: Municipalities with population ≤5,000 (exempted from GATA requirements); State grant‑making agencies; subrecipients and local governments that receive State or federal pass‑through awards; oversight/compliance operations under GATA.
- Policy impact: Reduces GATA compliance and administrative oversight obligations for very small municipalities, potentially lowering administrative burden and cost for those local governments while limiting State-level grant accountability requirements for those awards.
- Timing / procedure: Introduced Feb 6, 2025 (Rep. Kyle Moore). The bill text includes “This Act takes effect upon becoming law.” The synopsis indicates “Effective immediately.” The change is explicitly applied to pending actions as well as future awards.

Sponsor
- Rep. Kyle Moore (primary)

Procedural / Status Notes

  • The combined file shows mixed legislative actions/dates likely attributable to the two different bills. The Arizona text lists introduction on Feb 11, 2025 and status as Rule 19(a) / Re‑referred to Rules Committee. The Illinois material was introduced Feb 6, 2025 and lists standard introductory actions (first reading, referral to Rules Committee) and an effective‑upon‑enactment clause.
  • For enactment, each bill must follow its respective legislature’s committee and floor procedures; the Illinois version explicitly states immediate effect upon becoming law; the Arizona appropriation takes effect through the FY 2025–2026 appropriation (distribution specifics not provided).

If you want, I can:
- Produce a side‑by‑side comparison of how the Illinois amendment would change current GATA language.
- Draft a short fiscal note estimating downstream impacts of the Illinois exemption or provide local‑government reaction summaries.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.