WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 895

Food Retailers and Third-Party Delivery Service Providers - Dynamic Pricing and Personal Data (Protection From Predatory Pricing Act)

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Gabriel Acevero and 46 co-sponsors

Maryland bill restricts grocery stores from using dynamic pricing and surveillance data, aiming to prevent predatory pricing while protecting collective bargaining agreements in food retail.

Approved by the Governor - Chapter 154
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 895

Legislative bill overview

HB 895 restricts food retailers' ability to use dynamic pricing (adjusting prices in real-time based on demand or other factors) and limits their use of surveillance data. The bill also appears to protect collective bargaining agreements in the grocery sector and aims to prevent what sponsors characterize as "predatory pricing" practices that disproportionately affect consumers.

Why is this important

Grocery pricing directly impacts household budgets, particularly for lower-income families. Dynamic pricing in food retail is an emerging practice that could significantly alter how consumers experience price volatility at checkout. The bill addresses growing concerns about algorithmic pricing, data collection practices, and labor protections in an industry undergoing rapid technological change.

Potential points of contention

  • Economic impact on retailers: Grocery chains operate on thin profit margins (typically 1-3%); pricing restrictions could reduce flexibility to respond to supply chain costs, potentially affecting competitiveness or store closures in underserved areas
  • Consumer price effects: Opponents may argue restrictions limit retailers' ability to offer dynamic discounts during off-peak hours, potentially raising average prices; supporters contend it prevents surge pricing that harms vulnerable populations
  • Data privacy scope: The bill's surveillance data restrictions require clarification—unclear whether this prevents loyalty program tracking, security cameras, or extends to third-party data sharing, creating potential compliance confusion
  • Labor negotiation implications: Protections for collective bargaining in grocery sales could strengthen union leverage but may increase labor costs that retailers pass to consumers or shareholders

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.