WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HF 4292

Fees charged by commissioner of commerce for license applications and renewals modified.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Bidal Duran and 7 co-sponsors

HF 4292 changes Minnesota Commerce license fees, adjusting application and renewal amounts and timing to better align revenue with program costs.

Introduction and first reading, referred to Commerce Finance and Policy
#commercedepartment #tradepractices
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 4292

Summary: HF 4292 (2025-2026) – Fees Charged by Commissioner of Commerce for License Applications and Renewals Modified

Purpose and Intent

HF 4292 proposes changes to how the Minnesota Commissioner of Commerce assesses and collects fees for license applications and renewals. The bill seeks to modify current fee structures, potentially adjusting amounts, timing, or methodology used by the department when handling licenses issued under commerce-related statutes. The measure is intended to align fees more closely with administrative costs, program funding needs, or regulatory priorities as determined by the Legislature or the department.

Key Provisions and Changes

  • Fee Structure Adjustment: The bill modifies the fees charged by the Commissioner of Commerce for submitting license applications and for renewing existing licenses. Details of the new fee amounts, brackets, or tiering (e.g., by license type, license duration, or applicant category) would replace the current schedule.
  • Applicability: Applies to licenses administered by the Minnesota Commissioner of Commerce. This typically includes professional or business licenses issued under commerce-related statutes, though specific license types covered would be outlined in the statute or accompanying fiscal note.
  • Administrative Mechanism: Changes may specify how fees are collected (one-time at application, annual renewal, or periodic renewal intervals) and whether fee collection accompanies license issuance or is handled separately.
  • Revenue Use: The bill may indicate how revenue from the modified fees is to be allocated (e.g., funding for department operations, consumer protection programs, program-specific accounts, or general fund support). If not explicit in the bill text, this would be clarified in fiscal notes or agency budget documents.
  • Effective Date and Phase-In (if any): The bill could include an effective date for the new fee schedule or a phase-in period to transition from current rates. If provided, this would specify when license applicants and renewals would experience the new fees.

Who Would Be Affected

  • Applicants for Licenses: Individuals or entities seeking initial licenses under commerce-related programs would encounter revised application fees.
  • Licensees Up for Renewal: Current license holders renewing their licenses would be subject to updated renewal fees.
  • Businesses Regulated by Commerce: Firms and professionals under Minnesota’s commerce regulatory framework (e.g., certain trade, consumer protection, or professional licensing programs) would experience changes in ongoing licensing costs.
  • State Revenue and Administration: The Department of Commerce and the broader state budgeting process would be impacted by changes in fee-derived revenue and the administrative burden associated with processing applications and renewals.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Introduced and First Reading: Referred to the Commerce Finance and Policy committee on March 16, 2026.
  • Legislative Path: As a bill introduced in the 2025-2026 session, HF 4292 will be examined by the Senate counterparts and/or other committees as part of the normal appropriations/fee-structure review process. The committee of referral (Commerce Finance and Policy) will evaluate fiscal impact, statutory authority, and implementation details.
  • Potential Amendments: The bill could be amended to address concerns about affordability, economic impact on licensees, administrative cost recovery, or alignment with the agency’s budget.

Additional Notes

  • The bill lists multiple co-authors/sponsors, indicating bipartisan or cross-chamber support among members of the Minnesota Legislature.
  • Detailed numerical specifics (exact new fee amounts, categories, and any sunset or phase-in provisions) would be found in the bill text itself or accompanying fiscal notes. For a precise understanding, reviewing the current version of HF 4292 and any fiscal impact statements from the Department of Commerce is recommended.

If you’d like, I can pull the exact statutory provisions affected, proposed fee schedules, or the fiscal note once they are published to provide a more granular breakdown.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.