Bill
SB 1066
Arizona: Prohibits land conveyance to hostile foreign entities and tightens ID/recordkeeping for grantees.
Note: the provided document aggregates several distinct bills all labeled "SB 1066" from different states. Below are concise, separate summaries for each identifiable SB 1066 in the packet (Arizona, Hawaii, Illinois). Verify the jurisdiction before acting on any provision; legislative actions in the file appear to mix multiple states.
Purpose
- Limit or control conveyance of Arizona land to certain foreign entities and add identification/recordkeeping requirements for grantees.
Key provisions
- Adds ARS §33-459:
- Prohibits conveyance of land in Arizona to a "foreign entity that is hostile to the United States." (Introduced and engrossed versions differ on whether legislative approval is required; the introduced version required majority approval of both chambers; the engrossed version simply prohibits conveyance and defines "hostile" by DNI threat-assessment lists.)
- Requires the grantor and the grantor’s agent (including licensed real estate professionals) to submit valid identification for any grantee to the State Real Estate Department; if grantee is not a natural person, require ID of the grantee’s agent plus grantee name and principal place of business; copies retained by parties and the Department.
- Defines “foreign entity” (foreign government, state-controlled enterprise, or agent thereof) and lists acceptable forms of “valid identification” (photo ID such as Arizona driver license, tribal IDs, or other U.S./state/local government IDs).
- Amends ARS §37-231 (state lands sale/reservations). Text included is truncated but shows ongoing statutory language regarding mineral reservations, sales prohibitions for lands with hydrocarbon/mineral resources, and sale exceptions for lands within incorporated cities used for public purpose.
Who is affected / impact
- Affects real estate transactions involving foreign entities, real estate agents, state real estate department, and state land sales.
- Increases due diligence and recordkeeping for grantors/agents; may block or require legislative action for conveyances to certain foreign actors; could affect state land disposition procedures.
Purpose
- Recast Hawaii’s renewable hydrogen program into a broader long-duration clean energy storage program and move administration to the Hawaii State Energy Office to improve competitiveness for federal grants and support deployment.
Key provisions
- Establishes a "Long Duration Clean Energy Storage Investment Capital Special Fund":
- Sources: legislative appropriations, public/private contributions, interest, other monies.
- Uses: seed capital and venture investments to support R&D, testing, and implementation of long-duration storage projects.
- Renames/expands §196-10: creates the Hawaii Long Duration Clean Energy Storage Program (within the State Energy Office), covering renewable hydrogen, pumped storage hydroelectricity, batteries, other long-duration technologies.
- Program duties include strategic partnerships, engineering/economic evaluations, grid reliability projects, demonstration projects, public education/outreach, promotion, and policy evaluation to support adoption and funding of storage infrastructure.
- Prioritizes site evaluations for pumped storage that maximize benefits and minimize impacts to cultural/agricultural resources.
- Transfers program administration and related staff functions from Dept. of Business, Economic Development & Tourism to the Hawaii State Energy Office; repeals prior hydrogen investment special fund.
Who is affected / impact
- Affects state energy planning and programs, project developers, researchers, local communities near potential storage sites, and potential federal grant applicants.
- Intends to broaden technology scope (beyond hydrogen), centralize administration, and provide a funding vehicle to accelerate long‑duration storage deployment.
Purpose
- Technical amendment to the Illinois Pension Code (40 ILCS 5/3-101), described as a technical change concerning downstate police.
Key provisions / impact
- The filing amends Section 3-101 (creation/administration of municipal police pension funds). The text in the packet is fragmented; sponsors describe it as a technical/clerical modification rather than a substantive policy change.
- Expected impact: clarifying language in pension statute with no substantive change to benefits or administration (verify final text for specifics).
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.
