WeVote

Bill

Bill

HB 4630

Family law: marriage and divorce; certain references in the provision related to marriage license without publicity; make gender neutral. Amends sec. 1 of 1897 PA 180 (MCL 551.201). TIE BAR WITH: HJR F'25

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Joey Andrews and 24 co-sponsors

Michigan bill replaces gender-specific language with gender-neutral terms in marriage license statute, modernizing 128-year-old law to apply equally to all individuals.

bill electronically reproduced 06/10/2025
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 4630

Legislative bill overview

HB 4630 amends Michigan's 1897 marriage law (MCL 551.201) to replace gender-specific language with gender-neutral terminology in provisions governing marriage licenses obtained without public notice. The bill modernizes statutory language to reflect contemporary understanding of gender identity while maintaining the legal framework for confidential marriage procedures.

Why is this important

Michigan's foundational marriage statute contains language written 128 years ago that uses gendered terms no longer reflective of legal practice or modern families. Updating this language removes potential legal ambiguity and ensures the statute applies equally to all individuals seeking marriage, regardless of gender identity. This is a technical cleanup measure that affects how marriage license procedures are documented in state law.

Potential points of contention

  • Statutory interpretation concerns: Some may argue that changing gender-specific language could create legal questions about whether the amendment alters substantive rights or is merely technical—though legislative intent would likely clarify this as purely linguistic.
  • Scope questions: Critics might debate whether partial updates to an 1897 statute should trigger comprehensive review of other gendered language throughout Michigan family law rather than piecemeal amendments.
  • Values disagreement: Opponents of gender-neutral language in law may view this as unnecessary or ideologically motivated, while supporters see it as overdue modernization ensuring equal legal treatment.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.