WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 430

Establishes the office of pretrial services

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Zellnor Myrie and 3 co-sponsors

Establishes a special commission to review and reform Massachusetts special education financing (Chapter 71B) for stable, equitable funding and higher 90% circuit breaker reimburse

REFERRED TO CODES
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 430

Summary — S. 430 (Senate No. 430, 194th General Court, 2025)

Title: An Act relative to the long-term fiscal health and sustainability of special education in the Commonwealth

Note on source material: The legislative text provided is a Massachusetts Senate bill (filed by Senator Jacob R. Oliveira and others). Some metadata supplied with the request (bill title "Establishes the office of pretrial services", sponsors such as Ted Cruz, and some procedural entries) conflict with the Massachusetts bill text. This summary focuses on the substantive text of the Massachusetts bill (Senate No. 430 / SD 2149).

Purpose / Intent

The bill creates a special commission to review Massachusetts’ special education financing (Chapter 71B) and to recommend changes to ensure long-term fiscal health, equitable distribution of funds, predictable funding, and improved educational outcomes for students with disabilities. It also proposes statutory changes to increase the state “circuit breaker” reimbursement rate and to extend reimbursement rules for transportation and certain early childhood placements.

Key provisions

  • Special Commission

    • Establishes a special commission charged with studying Chapter 71B and the Commonwealth’s special education financing structure.
    • Statutory goals for the commission’s recommendations include:
    • Ensuring funds are sufficient for high-quality education in the least restrictive environment.
    • Recognizing cost variation among disabilities.
    • Allocating more state assistance to districts with more students receiving special education and to districts with fewer local resources.
    • Providing predictable/stable funding to support multi-year district planning.
    • Avoiding incentives to under- or mis-diagnose disabilities.
    • Promoting flexibility and innovation.
    • Limiting excessive local financial responsibility for students with extraordinary needs.
    • Including reimbursement for Pre-K and kindergarten out-of-district placements.
    • Ensuring sufficient funding for transportation; specifying Circuit Breaker transportation reimbursement not less than 90%.
    • The commissioner of elementary and secondary education must provide data and reasonable staff support.
    • The commission must hold at least four public hearings across regions of the Commonwealth.
    • Membership includes: chairs of the joint committee on education, the commissioner (or designee), one House member (appointed by the Speaker), one Senate member (appointed by the Senate President), and ten governor appointees representing statewide education, municipal, parent, business, counselor, collaborative and labor organizations (specific seats enumerated in the bill).
    • Conflict-of-interest provision: service by school employees on the commission is not automatically a violation of G.L. c. 268A; the commission may adopt procedures to limit participation where direct financial conflicts arise.
    • Reporting: Commission must file its report with clerks of the House and Senate and make it publicly available on the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education website; the report is also sent to relevant legislative committees.

  • Changes to Chapter 71B (Circuit Breaker reimbursements)

    • Amends Section 5A(c) of Chapter 71B by striking the number “75” and inserting “90” — i.e., raising the referenced reimbursement threshold from 75% to 90%.
    • Adds language (partially truncated in the provided text) indicating transportation costs shall be reimbursed (the bill elsewhere states Circuit Breaker special education transportation reimbursement not less than 90%) and to include Pre-K and kindergarten out-of-district placements for circuit breaker reimbursement.

Who is affected

  • School districts and regional school authorities — potential increases in state reimbursement and changes to funding allocations and predictability.
  • Municipalities and local taxpayers — changes in state/local cost-sharing could alter local budgets and tax burdens.
  • Students with disabilities and families — potential increased access to services, out-of-district placements, and transportation support.
  • State budget and Department of Elementary and Secondary Education — increased fiscal obligations if reimbursements rise and responsibility for commission support and implementation.
  • Education stakeholders represented on the commission (superintendents, school committees, special education administrators, teacher unions, parent/advocacy groups, etc.).

Fiscal and policy impact (anticipated)

  • Raising circuit breaker reimbursement from 75% to 90% would increase state expenditures for high-cost special education outlays and transportation; exact fiscal impact depends on enrollment, per-student expenditures, and incidence of extraordinary-cost placements.
  • Shifting more cost burden to the Commonwealth reduces local fiscal responsibility for extraordinary needs but may require additional state appropriations and long-term budget adjustments.
  • Commission recommendations could drive structural changes to funding formulas, redistribution of aid, and implementation timelines.

Timeline / procedural status (from provided record)

  • Introduced in the Senate: filed 1/17/2025; presented as Senate No. 430.
  • Report deadline for the special commission: on or before June 30, 2027.
  • The bill text indicates referral to the Joint Committee on Education for study and action. (Provided legislative-action entries were inconsistent; other listed referrals/hearings appear to reflect multiple committee assignments and scheduling entries.)

Additional notes / caveats

  • The provided text was truncated in places (Section 3(b) transportation language incomplete). The bill contains multiple cross-references to Chapter 71B; a full reading of the enacted language would be required to confirm final statutory wording and effective dates.
  • Some metadata accompanying the request (alternate bill title, sponsors) appear to come from other jurisdictions or bills and do not match the Massachusetts bill text by Senator Oliveira. This summary prioritizes the content of the Massachusetts bill text (SD 2149 / Senate No. 430).

If you want, I can:
- Produce a side-by-side of current Chapter 71B Section 5A vs. the proposed text,
- Estimate potential fiscal impact ranges based on recent Massachusetts special education expenditures, or
- Extract and format the full list of commission membership and procedural steps as a checklist.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.