WeVote

Bill

Bill

SB 887

SB 887 - This act establishes the "Missouri Lyme Disease Eradication Act". First, Lyme disease is added to the list of diseases that must be reported to the Department of Health and Senior Services by health care providers, laboratories, and local health departments. The Department shall compile an annual report on the incidence and prevalence of Lyme disease in Missouri, as described in the act. The Department shall also collaborate with public four-year institutions of higher education to integrate Lyme disease surveillance data into existing tick-borne disease monitoring programs. Next, this act creates the "Lyme Research and Eradication Fund" in the state treasury. The Department shall use the moneys in the fund to distribute grants for the purposes of developing treatments, studying novel therapies, and researching eradication strategies. Grants shall be prioritized as described in the act, with no less than 20% of funds utilized to support eradication efforts in rural counties. Under this act, a health care provider shall not be subject to any discipline, suspension, or revocation of license or denial of a license renewal, solely for prescribing, administering, or dispensing treatments or therapies for Lyme disease or Post-Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome (PTLDS), including extended antibiotic therapy or similar treatment deemed medically necessary. Finally, this act requires every health carrier or health benefit plan offering or issuing health benefit plans in the state on or after January 1, 2027, to provide coverage for diagnostic testing, treatment, and management of Lyme disease and PTLDS for insured persons who receive a diagnosis from a licensed health care provider, including testing, antibiotic therapy, supportive therapies, and holistic or herbal supplements and therapies. Coverage shall be subject to the same deductibles, coinsurance, and out-of-pocket maximums as apply to other services covered under the plan for nonpreventative services. The carrier or plan shall not deny or limit coverage for Lyme disease tests or treatments based solely on guidelines that deem extended antibiotic therapy to be experimental, impose step therapy or prior authorization requirements described in the act, or rescind coverage retroactively for related claims without evidence of fraud. By July 1 each year, each carrier and plan shall report certain Lyme disease-related data to the Director of the Department of Commerce and Insurance, who shall share the data with the General Assembly and the Department of Health and Senior Services to inform research priorities. SARAH HASKINS

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Nick Schroer

Allows county boards to reappoint an incumbent county superintendent any time after the second year, with a March 1 renewal deadline.

Informal Calendar S Bills for Perfection
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 887

SB 887 — County Boards of Education: Reappointment of Incumbent County Superintendent — Authorization

Status (selected)
- Introduced: January 23, 2025
- Public hearing (scheduled): March 27, 2025 at 1:00 p.m.
- Cross‑file: HB 1512 (companion)
- Effective date if enacted: June 1, 2025

Summary — purpose and intent
- SB 887 authorizes county boards of education to reappoint an incumbent county superintendent earlier in the incumbent’s term than under current law, while preserving a March 1 deadline in the year the superintendent’s contract would be renewed. The change is intended to allow boards to take public action to reappoint a superintendent following the completion of the superintendent’s second year in office, giving boards flexibility to complete reappointment decisions before the final year of a term.

Key provisions and changes
- Term length and start date remain unchanged: a county superintendent’s term is four years beginning July 1 and the superintendent serves until a successor is appointed and qualifies.
- Reappointment timing (new): A county board may, at any public meeting after the end of the incumbent superintendent’s second year, take action to reappoint the incumbent to a new four‑year term beginning the immediately following July 1 — provided the board takes that reappointment action no later than March 1 of the year the contract would be renewed.
- Retains existing rule that if a board cannot appoint a superintendent by July 1 of the year a term begins, an interim superintendent appointment procedure applies.
- Exemptions: provisions do not apply to Baltimore City or Prince George’s County (consistent with current statutory exclusions).

Who is affected
- Directly: county boards of education and incumbent county superintendents (except in Baltimore City and Prince George’s County).
- Indirectly: local school systems and stakeholders who are affected by superintendent continuity and contract timing.

Procedural / fiscal impact
- Effective date: June 1, 2025 (per bill text).
- Fiscal note: the Department of Legislative Services reports no State or local fiscal impact — the change is procedural and should not directly affect school expenditures.
- Cross‑filed companion: HB 1512.

Notes and context
- The bill preserves the March 1 deadline in the renewal year but expands when a reappointment action may be taken (any time after the second anniversary of the incumbent’s term), potentially allowing earlier contract renewals and reducing last‑minute decisions in the final contract year.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.