WeVote

Bill

Bill

S 2473

Establishes the fresh air jobs tax credit

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Kevin Parker

Prohibits the governor from ordering state-active-duty National Guard or militia to violate the Massachusetts Constitution or state law, strengthening legal accountability.

REFERRED TO BUDGET AND REVENUE
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 2473

Bill Summary — S.2473 (Senate Docket No. 889)

Short title(s): Appears in the bill text as "An Act relative to ensuring the safety of the Commonwealth."
Jurisdiction: Commonwealth of Massachusetts (Senate Docket No. 889)
Filed: Jan 15, 2025 (docket); presented by Sen. Jason M. Lewis
Recent status / actions (from provided record): Referred to Veterans and Federal Affairs; hearing scheduled 09/16/2025; various committee referrals listed (including Budget and Revenue).
Note on metadata: The materials provided contain conflicting and possibly conflated metadata (e.g., a “Federal Firefighters Families First Act” description and a separate title about a “fresh air jobs tax credit,” plus sponsors from other jurisdictions). This summary focuses on the actual bill text submitted as Senate Docket No. 889 / S.2473 for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

Purpose / Intent

The bill aims to ensure that the commander‑in‑chief (the Governor) does not order or authorize organized militia or National Guard personnel who are on state active duty to violate the Massachusetts Constitution or any Commonwealth law. It is framed as a public‑safety and legal‑compliance safeguard.

Key provision(s)

  • Amends Chapter 33, Section 42 of the Massachusetts General Laws by replacing the existing text with the following requirement:
    • “The commander in chief shall not order or authorize any part of the organized militia or National Guard personnel on state active duty to violate the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts or any law of the Commonwealth.”
  • The amendment is narrowly targeted: it prohibits an executive order/authorization that would require state‑active‑duty militia/Guard personnel to act in violation of state constitutional or statutory law.

Who is affected

  • Governor of Massachusetts (as commander‑in‑chief at the state level) — limits the scope of lawful orders for state active duty deployments.
  • Massachusetts organized militia and the Massachusetts National Guard while serving on state active duty.
  • Adjutant General, state-level military legal advisors, and agencies that issue or implement activation orders.
  • Potentially affected: municipal authorities relying on Guard/militia support, legal counsel, civil‑rights or oversight bodies that might enforce this prohibition.

Likely impacts and considerations

  • Legal/administrative: Codifies an explicit prohibition against ordering state Guard/militia to violate state law or constitution, which could strengthen legal accountability and provide clearer grounds for refusal or challenge to unlawful orders.
  • Operational: May require review or clarification of existing activation orders, training, and rules of engagement to ensure compliance with state law.
  • Enforcement and interpretation questions: What constitutes a “violation” may be litigated; situations involving conflicts between state and federal orders (e.g., federal activation or dual‑status scenarios) could raise complex preemption or command‑authority issues.
  • Fiscal impact: No costs, appropriations, or tax impacts are specified in the text provided.

Procedural / timeline notes

  • Filed as Senate Docket No. 889 (Jan 15, 2025) and presented by Sen. Jason M. Lewis.
  • Referred to the committee with jurisdiction over veterans/military affairs; a committee hearing was scheduled (09/16/2025 in provided calendar).
  • Other procedural entries in the provided record list referrals to Budget and Revenue and other committees; track committee reports and amendments for changes.

Caveats / anomalies in the provided materials

  • The packet includes unrelated or inconsistent metadata (references to a “Federal Firefighters Families First Act,” a “fresh air jobs tax credit,” and sponsors from other jurisdictions). Those items do not match the Massachusetts bill text reproduced here. This summary is limited to the Massachusetts S.2473 text (amendment to Chapter 33, §42) and the accompanying procedural entries in the docket.

If you want, I can:
- Track committee actions/amendments and prepare an update after the hearing; or
- Produce a short legal analysis of how this change might interact with federal activation orders and the dual‑status Guard doctrine.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.