WeVote
Log In

Bill

DS

Bill

S 371

Establishes "The CAMPUS Act: Combating Antisemitism to Mitigate Prejudice in Universities and Schools"; addresses instruction on antisemitism and antisemitic harassment, intimidation, and bullying in public schools.

2026-2027 Regular Session Introduced by Doug Steinhardt

New Jersey establishes mandatory antisemitism education and anti-harassment policies in public schools to combat student incidents targeting Jewish pupils.

Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Education Committee
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 371

Legislative bill overview

S 371 establishes the "CAMPUS Act" to address antisemitism in New Jersey public schools through mandated instruction on antisemitism and policies addressing antisemitic harassment, intimidation, and bullying. The bill requires schools to implement educational components and anti-harassment measures specifically targeting antisemitic conduct and incidents.

Why is this important

Antisemitic incidents in schools have increased nationally in recent years, affecting Jewish students' sense of safety and belonging. The bill attempts to create a standardized, statewide framework for addressing these issues through both education and enforcement, potentially serving as a model for other states facing similar challenges.

Potential points of contention

  • Curriculum content disputes: Defining what constitutes appropriate instruction on antisemitism and who determines curriculum content could create conflicts between school boards, parents, and educators over educational priorities
  • Definition ambiguity: The bill's effectiveness depends on how "antisemitism," "harassment," and "intimidation" are defined and interpreted—vague definitions may lead to inconsistent enforcement or overreach
  • Resource requirements: Implementation may require significant training, curriculum development, and administrative resources that schools must budget for without clear state funding mechanisms specified
  • Free speech considerations: Determining where antisemitic speech ends and protected speech begins raises constitutional questions about balancing safety with First Amendment protections

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.