WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

A 5507

Establishes presumption for accidental disability retirement in PERS and PFRS that emergency medical technician, firefighter, and police officer has Parkinson's disease as result of employment.

2024-2025 Regular Session Introduced by Anthony Verrelli

New Jersey bill presumes Parkinson's disease in firefighters, EMTs, and police officers is job-caused for disability retirement benefits eligibility.

Introduced in the Assembly, Referred to Assembly State and Local Government Committee
#emersvcs #pensions #pensionspol
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · A 5507

Legislative bill overview

Bill A 5507 creates a legal presumption that emergency medical technicians (EMTs), firefighters, and police officers who develop Parkinson's disease did so as a result of their employment. This presumption applies to disability retirement claims under New Jersey's Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) and Police and Firemen's Retirement System (PFRS), shifting the burden of proof away from the individual claimant.

Why is this important

First responders and EMTs face occupational exposures to pesticides, heavy metals, and other neurotoxic substances that research has linked to Parkinson's disease. Currently, workers must prove their illness is job-related to receive disability benefits—a difficult and expensive process. This bill would streamline access to disability retirement benefits for affected workers and their families, potentially providing financial security for those unable to work due to this degenerative neurological condition.

Potential points of contention

  • Fiscal impact: Expanding presumptive eligibility for disability benefits increases costs to PERS and PFRS, potentially raising contribution rates for employers and other members
  • Medical causation standards: Creating a blanket presumption may conflict with scientific evidence standards, as Parkinson's has multiple causes and isn't universally proven occupational in origin for all first responders
  • Scope and fairness: Questions about whether the presumption should apply equally to all three occupations, whether it should include other occupational groups with similar exposures, and whether presumptions for other occupational diseases are needed for consistency

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.