WeVote

Bill

Bill

A 2625

Establishes a pilot program to provide high impact tutoring

2025 Regular Session Introduced by George Alvarez and 14 co-sponsors

Launches a pilot of high-impact tutoring to boost student achievement and close gaps, with district participation and evaluation to guide potential expansion.

REFERRED TO EDUCATION
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · A 2625

Bill A 2625 — Summary

Overview

  • Bill Number: A 2625
  • Title: Establishes a pilot program to provide high impact tutoring
  • Status: Referred to Education
  • Introduced: January 21, 2025
  • Classification: Legislative bill

Purpose and Intent

  • The bill proposes the creation of a pilot program to deliver high impact tutoring to students. While the specific design details are not provided here, the intent is to evaluate tutoring approaches that are evidence-based and likely targeted at improving student learning outcomes, closing achievement gaps, and supporting districts or schools with identified needs.

Key Provisions (What the bill would do)

  • Establish a pilot program to provide high impact tutoring services.
  • Design and implementation details (e.g., eligible students, participating districts, tutor qualifications, program models, duration, and intensity) would be specified in the bill text.
  • Likely components to be specified in the bill (based on typical high impact tutoring programs) may include:
    • Selection criteria for participating schools/districts
    • Tutor training requirements and qualifications
    • Tutoring models (e.g., small-group or one-on-one, frequency, and duration)
    • Alignment with grade-level or subject-area standards
    • Data collection and student progress monitoring
    • Evaluation metrics and performance reporting
    • Oversight, accountability, and reporting to the Legislature or Education Department

Note: The summary above reflects common elements in high impact tutoring pilots. The exact provisions will be outlined in the bill's text.

Implementation and Affected Parties

  • Primary affected entities: Students in participating districts/schools, educators, school administrators, and tutoring providers.
  • The Department of Education (or equivalent state education agency) would oversee program implementation, reporting, and evaluation as part of the pilot.

Funding and Evaluation (Forthcoming in Text)

  • Specific funding amounts, sources, and evaluation plans are not provided in the information given. The bill is expected to address:
    • Funding level and appropriation mechanism
    • Duration of the pilot and milestones
    • Methods for evaluating effectiveness (outcomes, metrics, and reporting)
    • Plans for potential expansion beyond the pilot if successful

Legislative Status and Timeline

  • Actions:
    • 2025-01-21: Referred to Education (listed twice in the record)
  • Referred to the Education Committee indicates initial review and potential hearings before advancing.

Sponsors

  • Primary Sponsor: Brian Cunningham
  • Cosponsors: Kwani O'Pharrow, Eddie Gibbs, Jessica Gonzalez-Rojas, Tommy Schiavoni, Maritza Davila, George Alvarez, Josh Jensen, Tony Simone, Rebecca Kassay, David McDonough, John Zaccaro Jr., Anil Beephan Jr., Larinda Hooks, Paula Kay

Related Legislation

  • A 7788 (prior-session) — related bill
  • S 1820 (companion) — Senate companion bill (listed twice in the record)

Potential Impact

  • If enacted, the bill could provide targeted, evidence-informed tutoring to students in need, potentially improving reading and math outcomes and narrowing achievement gaps.
  • The pilot framework aims to generate data to inform possible expansion or replication in other districts or statewide.
  • Success depends on specifics such as funding adequacy, implementation quality, tutor effectiveness, and robust evaluation.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.