WeVote

Bill

Bill

SB 1052

SCS/SB 1052 - Current law provides that all fees and charges for services under the workers' compensation law shall be fair and reasonable, subject to regulation by the Division of Workers' Compensation or the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. This act creates the Workers' Compensation Fee Schedule Commission, which is delegated the responsibility of establishing by rule a schedule of fees for any service provided pursuant to the workers' compensation law and further requires all fees and charges under such law to be in accordance with the fee schedule. The medical fee schedule shall promote health care cost containment and efficiency, and shall be sufficient to ensure availability of such reasonably necessary treatment, care, and attendance to each injured employee to cure and relieve the employee from the effects of the injury. The Commission shall be reconvened not sooner than once every three years to consider adjustments in the fee schedule. The commission shall produce the initial medical fee schedule not later than January 1, 2027. The initial medical fee schedule shall take effect on July 1, 2028. This act is identical to a provision in SCS/HCS/HB 2375 (2026) and similar to a provision in SB 1385 (2026). SCOTT SVAGERA

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Curtis Trent

SB 1052 caps fees for healthcare providers and service professionals handling Missouri workers' compensation claims to control system costs.

SCS Voted Do Pass S General Laws Committee (5741S.02C)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 1052

Legislative bill overview

SB 1052 establishes a maximum fee schedule for services performed under Missouri's workers' compensation law. This bill would cap the fees that healthcare providers, attorneys, and other service providers can charge when delivering services related to workers' compensation claims.

Why is this important

Fee schedules directly affect the cost of workers' compensation insurance and claims processing. By capping fees, the bill could reduce overall workers' compensation costs for employers and insurers, but may also impact provider willingness to serve injured workers and the quality or availability of services in the workers' compensation system.

Potential points of contention

  • Provider reimbursement rates: Healthcare providers and service professionals may argue that fee caps are too restrictive and don't reflect actual costs or market rates, potentially discouraging participation in workers' compensation cases
  • Access to care: Lower fees might reduce provider availability, leaving injured workers with fewer options for medical treatment or legal representation
  • Cost-shifting concerns: Caps could pressure providers to shift costs elsewhere or reduce service quality, or employers may argue caps don't go far enough to control system expenses

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.