WeVote

Bill

Bill

HR 36

Ensley, Mrs. Oreatha Walker; commend

2026 Special Session Introduced by Sandra Scott

HR 36 designates a formal commendation recognizing Mrs. Oreatha Walker Ensley for her contributions.

House Read and Adopted
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 36

Bill Summary: HR 36 (Georgia, 2026 Session)

Main purpose and intent

  • HR 36 recognizes and honors Mrs. Oreatha Walker Ensley and designates a commendation in her name. The bill serves as a ceremonial/recognition measure to commend her contributions.

Key provisions and changes

  • Establishes a formal commendation acknowledging the achievements and impact of Mrs. Oreatha Walker Ensley.
  • Names or designates a public recognition (commemoration) within the Georgia legislative framework, typically expressed through a resolution of recognition or tribute.
  • Includes sponsor language and (co-)sponsors. In this case:
    • Primary sponsor: not explicitly listed in the provided text.
    • Co-sponsor: Sandra Scott.

Note: The text provided appears to be partial or in a non-text-structured form (PDF/encoded blocks). The summary above reflects standard elements typically found in a House resolution recognizing an individual, including the purpose of commending the person and identifying sponsors. If the final bill text includes more detail (e.g., a specific title for the resolution, a formal resolution number, or additional statements about Mrs. Ensley’s achievements), those would be incorporated once the complete, readable text is available.

Who or what would be affected

  • Individuals and entities:
    • Mrs. Oreatha Walker Ensley would receive the recognition described in the resolution.
  • General public:
    • The recognition would contribute to public record and civic acknowledgment of local community leadership or service.
  • Legislative record:
    • The Georgia House would publish and present a formal resolution commending Mrs. Ensley.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Action history indicates recent parliamentary steps:
    • House Hopper (introduced and moved to committee stage)
    • House First Readers (introduction stage)
    • House Read and Adopted (passed its initial floor readings)
  • Sponsor information:
    • Co-sponsor: Sandra Scott
  • Typical next steps (not specific to this text but common for resolutions):
    • If adopted by the House, the resolution may be transmitted to Mrs. Ensley or her representatives and publicly memorialized.
    • No fiscal impact or statutory change is typically associated with ceremonial resolutions, though they may carry symbolic significance.

Observations and context

  • The bill is a ceremonial/recognition measure rather than a substantive policy change.
  • As a resolution recognizing an individual, it is usually non-binding and does not create new duties or funding obligations.
  • If you need a more detailed articulation of Mrs. Ensley’s specific contributions (biographical details, dates, organizations), we would benefit from the complete, readable bill text or accompanying sponsor statements.

If you can provide the clean text or a link to the official bill, I can refine this summary with precise biographical details, the exact language of the commendation, and any additional procedural notes.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.