WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 553

ENERGY/CONSERVATION: Prohibits the exercise of eminent domain or unitization for a pipeline that carries carbon dioxide

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Rodney Schamerhorn

Louisiana bill prohibits using eminent domain or forced pooling to acquire land for carbon dioxide pipelines, restricting government power to assemble continuous pipeline rights-of-way.

Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Natural Resources and Environment.
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 553

Legislative bill overview

HB 553 prohibits the state from using eminent domain (forced property acquisition) or unitization (forced pooling of mineral interests) to facilitate the construction or operation of carbon dioxide pipelines. The bill essentially blocks the government from compulsively acquiring private land or consolidating property rights for CO2 pipeline projects.

Why is this important

Carbon dioxide pipelines are increasingly proposed as infrastructure for carbon capture and sequestration projects—a key climate mitigation strategy. This bill directly impacts whether such projects can proceed by removing a critical tool for assembling the continuous right-of-way required for pipeline construction. The outcome affects both energy policy and private property rights in Louisiana, a state with significant oil and gas interests.

Potential points of contention

  • Climate vs. Property Rights: Supporters frame this as protecting landowner autonomy; opponents argue it could block important climate infrastructure and economic development projects that require continuous pathways.
  • Economic Development Impact: CO2 pipeline projects may involve significant investment and job creation; restricting eminent domain could either deter development or force project sponsors to negotiate individually with every affected property owner, raising costs.
  • Energy Industry Dynamics: This targets specifically CO2 pipelines while allowing eminent domain for traditional oil/gas pipelines, raising questions about policy consistency and whether the restriction reflects genuine property rights concerns or opposition to carbon capture technology.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.