WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 5711

Energy: alternative sources; clean and renewable energy standards; eliminate. Amends title & secs. 1, 3, 7, 9, 11, 75, 77, 83, 87, 101, 173 & 191 of 2008 PA 295 (MCL 460.1001 et seq.) & repeals subpt. A of pt. 2 & sec. 179 of 2008 PA 295 (MCL 460.1022 - 460.1054 & 460.1179). TIE BAR WITH: HB 5710'26

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Greg Alexander and 39 co-sponsors

Michigan bill would eliminate state-mandated clean energy standards requiring utilities to source renewable electricity, removing legal obligations for renewable energy development.

REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS
#energy:alternativesources
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 5711

Legislative bill overview

HB 5711 proposes to eliminate Michigan's clean and renewable energy standards—requirements that utilities generate or procure increasing percentages of electricity from renewable sources. The bill is tied to HB 5710, meaning both must pass together. This represents a significant rollback of the state's existing renewable energy mandates.

Why is this important

Michigan currently requires utilities to source 15% of electricity from renewable energy by 2021 (with a previous timeline). Eliminating these standards would remove legal obligations for renewable energy development, affecting investment in solar, wind, and other clean energy projects, while potentially reducing pressure on utilities to transition away from fossil fuels. This could impact state climate goals, energy infrastructure planning, and the renewable energy sector's growth trajectory.

Potential points of contention

  • Climate and environmental impact: Removal of renewable standards may conflict with climate commitments and increase reliance on fossil fuels or existing nuclear capacity
  • Energy market effects: Utilities and renewable energy companies have made long-term investments based on these mandates; elimination could create financial and operational uncertainty
  • Economic trade-offs: Supporters may argue reduced regulatory burden lowers energy costs, while critics contend it undercuts a growing clean energy job sector and increases long-term climate costs

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.