WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 46

Enact the Extreme Risk Protection Order Act

136th Legislature (2025-2026) Introduced by Munira Abdullahi and 13 co-sponsors

Ohio HB 46 creates extreme risk protection orders allowing courts to temporarily remove firearms from individuals posing imminent danger to themselves or others.

Referred to committee
#courts #courtsandcivillaw #crimeandpunishment #crimes #corrections #andlawenforcement #domesticrelations #firearms #juvenileandfamilylaw #lawenforcement
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 46

Legislative bill overview

HB 46 would establish an Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) process in Ohio, allowing law enforcement, medical professionals, or other designated parties to petition courts for temporary removal of firearms from individuals deemed to pose a significant risk of harm to themselves or others. The bill creates a legal mechanism for rapid intervention when someone exhibits warning signs of imminent danger, with provisions for due process and eventual return of firearms if circumstances change.

Why is this important

ERPOs represent a middle-ground policy approach to gun violence prevention that aims to prevent tragedies through early intervention rather than permanent restrictions. Twenty-one states plus D.C. have implemented similar laws, and research suggests they correlate with reduced suicide rates. However, Ohio currently lacks this tool, making it relevant to ongoing national debates about balancing public safety with Second Amendment protections.

Potential points of contention

  • Due process concerns: Critics worry that temporary firearm removal before full hearings could violate Second Amendment rights or be subject to misuse; supporters argue existing ERPO laws include adequate protections and court oversight
  • Definitional disputes: Questions about what constitutes "extreme risk" and who qualifies to petition (police, family members, mental health professionals, healthcare workers) will likely generate debate over scope and accessibility
  • Implementation costs and training: The bill requires judicial and law enforcement resources for processing orders and handling firearm storage, raising questions about funding and consistency across Ohio counties

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.