WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 4720

Elections: voting equipment; use of electronic voting systems that contain certain parts or equipment; prohibit. Amends secs. 795 & 795a of 1954 PA 116 (MCL 168.795 & 168.795a).

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Jay DeBoyer and 4 co-sponsors

Michigan bill would ban electronic voting systems with unspecified parts, potentially requiring costly county equipment replacement and raising implementation questions.

REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS
#elections:votingequipment
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 4720

Legislative bill overview

HB 4720 would prohibit Michigan from using electronic voting systems that contain certain specified parts or equipment in elections. The bill amends existing Michigan election law (sections 795 and 795a of the 1954 Michigan Election Law) to add restrictions on voting machine components. The bill was introduced in July 2025 and is currently in the Committee on Election Integrity.

Why is this important

Voting equipment standards directly affect election administration, accessibility, and public confidence in election integrity. Restricting certain voting system components could require Michigan counties to replace existing equipment, potentially creating significant fiscal impacts and implementation challenges. The specificity of what parts are prohibited will determine whether this affects a wide range of systems or targets particular concerns.

Potential points of contention

  • Lack of public detail: The bill text does not specify which parts or equipment are prohibited, making it difficult to assess the scope and practical impact without the full legislative language
  • Equipment replacement costs: Mandating removal of certain components or system replacements could impose substantial unfunded mandates on Michigan counties already managing election budgets
  • Accessibility concerns: Voting system modifications must maintain compliance with accessibility requirements for voters with disabilities; restrictions could complicate this balance
  • Technical feasibility: Depending on the components targeted, prohibitions might eliminate certain voting systems entirely from the market or require expensive modifications

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.