WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 5766

ELEC CD-OBJECTION RULINGS

104th Regular Session Introduced by Brad Fritts

Requires electoral board rulings on objections to nominations or petitions to be transmitted to election authorities and county clerks before ballot printing if no judicial review

Referred to Rules Committee
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 5766

Summary of HB5766 (104th General Assembly, Illinois)

Purpose and intent

HB5766 would modify provisions in the Illinois Election Code governing objections to petitions for nomination or related public policy questions. The primary aim is to require the electoral board to transmit its final ruling to the relevant election authorities and county clerk before ballots are printed, provided no judicial review has been commenced. The bill also restructures certain procedural aspects of how objections are heard and how evidence is presented.

Key provisions and changes

  • Timing of transmission of rulings (core change):

    • If no judicial review has been commenced, the electoral board must send a certified copy of its ruling on objections to nominations (or related petitions) to:
    • The election authority to whom the ballot is certified
    • The appropriate county clerk
    • This transmission must occur before the date on which ballots must be printed (i.e., prior to ballot printing deadlines under existing statute).

  • Notice and meeting procedures (existing framework retained with details):

    • After receipt of the certificate of nomination or nomination papers and the objector’s petition, the chair of the electoral board (except the State Board of Elections) must notify:
    • All electoral board members
    • The objector and the candidate or proponents of the measure, or their counsel
    • The election authority and the county clerk
    • The county sheriff to serve copies of the call and to designate the time, place, and date for the hearing
    • Hearings are to occur in designated locations (county courthouse for county/township/educational boards; or a location chosen by municipal/township/college districts if available)

  • Authority of the electoral board at hearings:

    • The board may administer oaths, subpoena witnesses, and issue subpoenas duces tecum, with enforcement through the circuit court as needed.
    • Service of subpoenas and related fees follow standard county procedures, with costs borne by the party causing the subpoenas.

  • Rules of procedure and evidence:

    • The electoral board must adopt procedural rules on the first day of its meeting for evidence handling and argument presentation.
    • Briefs may be filed by the parties or interested persons at the board’s discretion.

  • Special provisions for statewide/state constitutional issues:

    • For State Electoral Board hearings on constitutional amendments or statewide public policy questions, certificates showing random-sample signature results are treated as prima facie valid and accurate, subject to challenge with competent evidence. Absent such evidence, these certificates help establish the valid/invalid signature ratio by jurisdiction unless contested.

  • Scope of scrutiny by the board:

    • The board will determine:
    • Whether the certificate of nomination/petitions is in proper form
    • Compliance with filing deadlines and conditions
    • Authenticity of the certificates and whether they reflect the underlying caucus or convention decisions
    • The board’s findings must be written, indicating which objections are sustained, and copies must be served to the parties.

  • Judicial review and finality:

    • The electoral board’s decision is final subject to judicial review under existing Section 10-10.1.
    • If a party does not appear, service of the decision is deemed effective as described in the statute.

  • Post-decision transmission:

    • After the window for judicial review closes, the board must transmit a certified copy of its ruling, plus the original nominating documents and the objector’s petition, to the appropriate authorities (county clerks, election authorities, etc.) so they can comply with the ruling, including before ballot printing deadlines.

Who is affected

  • Electoral boards (County Officers Electoral Board, Municipal/Township/Education Officers Electoral Boards, and the State Board of Elections when designated) are given explicit procedural duties and powers related to hearings, subpoenas, and rulings.
  • Objectors who file petitions challenging nominations or public policy questions.
  • Candidates and proponents of the measures or amendments being objected to.
  • Election authorities and county clerks responsible for certifying ballots and ensuring compliance with rulings.
  • Voters indirectly, through the integrity and timely resolution of objections prior to ballot printing.

Procedural and timeline considerations

  • The bill adds a strict timeline requirement: rulings must be transmitted before ballots are printed if no judicial review is filed.
  • It standardizes notice and service requirements for hearings and mandates written findings.
  • It clarifies enforcement mechanisms for subpoenas and the ability to compel testimony or document production.
  • It preserves the option for judicial review while tightening who receives rulings and when.

Practical impact

  • Aims to reduce delays by ensuring that clear, certified rulings are quickly shared with the election authorities responsible for ballot preparation.
  • Enhances transparency and formalizes procedures for objections to nominations and public policy measures.
  • Could affect the speed of ballot printing in close-proximity election cycles if objections arise late.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.